I’m so impressed by Spiro Skouras’ work, which marries great research with great writing and great video editing.
In this piece, he describes how the central bakers’ plan to roll out the “sustainable financial system”, with a stated goal of reaching a “net zero carbon economy”, supervised by an international oversight organization named the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.
To understand what is in store for this new decade, we need only look to the controllers who have shaped the last century. Let’s begin with the central banks. The central banks have become obsessed with two objectives. As Zero Hedge points out, one of these objectives is “climate change”. The other is blockchain technology and the digitization of currency or assets.
These two facts become apparent when you visit the websites and/or social media accounts of the global financial institutions, whether it’s the World Bank the International Monetary Fund or the Bank for International Settlements. These global central banks are considered to be the central banks *of* central banks – the movers and shakers.
In other words, each and every country, which has its own central bank – the equivalent to the Federal Reserve in the United States or the European Central Bank in Europe – all report back to these institutions. And none of them are government institutions; these are privately-owned banks, which control their hosting nation’s currency and their monetary policy.
As we begin to examine these central bank’s publications, like the report just published by the IMF titled ’50 shades of Green’, written by the governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney the “point of view”, as they call it or the agenda quickly becomes apparent: the world needs a new sustainable financial system to stop “runaway climate change”. There are key takeaways from this document, which openly signaled the dawn of a new era.
Carney clearly states that a new financial system is already under construction and this new financial system is already funding initiatives and innovation in the private sector, implying a clear distinction or separation between the new financial system and the private sector.
Although this private sector, which is being financed by this new sustainable financial system is working in concert with governments to enhance their climate policies, with a stated goal of reaching a “net zero carbon economy”, globally in the not-too-distant future.
The private sector, which the IMF and the Bank of England are referring to through their conduit, Mark Carney is an international oversight organization named the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. As Carney states in his report, the TCFD was catalyzed by the G20 but established by the private sector.
So, who is the TCFD and what do they do? The Task Force on climate-Related Financial Disclosures website states that their mission is to “develop voluntary consistent climate related financial risk disclosures for use by companies and providing information to investors, lenders, insurers and other stakeholders,” – and this is where it gets interesting: “The task force will consider the physical liability and transition risks associated with climate change and what constitutes effective financial disclosures across industries.”
So in other words, based on a company’s financial disclosures this ‘private task force’ will determine if your business is contributing to climate change – and thus, a threat to human civilization. This information will be provided to the banks, the insurance companies, the governments and so on, so businesses may not be able to get a loan or insurance or proper licensing to operate, or either will be taxed into submission or into bankruptcy, if your company’s climate risk assessment is ‘unsatisfactory’.
So, that’s the mission of the task force. Now, let’s see who they are. The [former] presidential candidate and controversial billionaire, Michael Bloomberg is the chairman of the Task Force. Yes, the same Michael Bloomberg who enforced ‘stop and frisk’ measures in New York City.
It’s notable to point out that all of the members of the Task Force were hand-picked by the Financial Stability Board. Now, before Mark Carney was the Governor of the Bank of England, he was the head of the Financial Stability Board, whose members consist of virtually every central bank in the G20, like the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, Russia, China, Japan and many others, in addition to the IMF, the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements.
So, I guess the private task force isn’t so private, after all.
Don’t miss this incredible report by Spiro Skouras.
Sorry Sir, I may agree with parts of your discourse, but frankly, there’s a very tendentious proposal from your part, regarding the CO2= PxSxExC equation. Yes, the “P”(Population), can be reduced by health care, vaccines etc… as families in the third world have numerous offspring to assure survival of some. Better health implies direct population reduction. A well-studied subject, I believe. Please be so kind and rectify, or provide alternative arguments in the light of what I have just mentioned.
whatever happened to Glen Beck?
Lies, damned lies, and Rockefeller speech.
Yes, the human population is excessive, particularly if we want to play with satellites and wartoys.
Not because of “klimachange” but because there are millions of other species living here. Some of them, like cetaceans, might be objectively more important than us. None of them threatens to wreck the planet.
There are car dealers who want to add a 7-17% penalty to the cost of a new car if purchase is by cash. Dealer profit is sustained by other than cash strategies.
The other side of the coin is electronic cars and hydrogen vehicles are the coming wave. Considering the footprint of cars in general, that will be significant. Anything coming out of any kind of sprayer or spray can is significant.
Lastly, population control. Examples in this video regarding reproductive freedom and population control have been around long before the world’s banks interest in sustainability. This has nothing to do with Hitler who wanted to eradicate races and the infirm. This has to do with the number of people on earth, that the earth can sustain without total destruction of the planet. Please read works by Dr. Erlich of Stanford University in the 1960’s when he made predictions of what will happen to the planet without controls of population output.
I didn’t need pages and pages of drivel to express my opinion. Population control is imperative, religion and freedom of choice be abrogated. Hard facts are facts.
Without rebuilding the entire electric grid, electric cars in every garage is a pipe dream. There is no capacity anywhere to allow for every charger to be turned on. It’s either a massive rebuild, or then, where are you going to get the power from? In BC, Canada it is estimated that we would require 15 massive hydro dams to “go electric”. The other side of the story is entranched and severe poverty. You can’t own a car and be as poor as a church mouse. Dr. LOL Erlich is a failed seer of massive proportions. He holds the record for being wrong the most times of all seers in modern times. He also is a charter member of the Club of Rome.