Problem. Reaction. Solution.
I had an interesting insight the other day: the pandemic security theater to which we’re being subjected; the authoritarian lockdowns, the mask mandates, the closed businesses that have bankrupted millions of people – all of this is designed with the purpose of discrediting the whole idea of representative government.
If the people you elect and the government to which you pay taxes will so insouciantly bankrupt you and heckle you about wearing masks, your eventual reaction will be to “burn it down,” as BLM and Antifa are wont to do. It looks like all of us, on every side are being manipulated toward this outcome.
The “solution” is a purely AI-driven technocratic order, where everyone and everything is tokenized and put on the Internet of Things, with as many human decision-makers as possible removed from the equation. An important function of this network would be to disable the ability of dissenters to financially transact, effectively canceling them, as described by Aaron Russo, from a conversation he had with Nicholas Rockefeller in the late 1990s.
Still, one might understand the appeal of a faceless but efficient, automated government, if we could be spared having to countenance the Nancy Pelosis, the Adam Schiffs and the Ilhan Omars of the world perverting the law; the Gavin Newsoms and the Gretchen Whitmers keeping us indefinitely unemployed and the Bill DeBlasios and the Jenny Durkans inciting felons by dismantling the police.
We know that COVID-19 is a highly-scripted Globalist exercise, because Mike Pompeo accidentally admitted as much last March and also because it’s evident that governments and media around the world are all following the same script promoted by Internationalist entities, like the UN, the World Economic Forum and the Rockefeller Foundation.
In May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, in which they proposed various scenarios that would put enormous stress on society in order to gauge the response and therefore, to anticipate future trends in technology and development.
The first scenario, entitled, “Lock Step”, describes a world of total government control during a pandemic that would allow national leaders to flex their authority and impose airtight rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded.
Reading what was written ten years ago is like reading the script of what happened in 2020:
“At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”
Toward the end of the Lock Step scenario, something plays out, which may be the actual intended outcome of this whole exercise:
“Protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries.”
This film is the latest by TruthStream Media, with many musings on all of the above and everything that’s been happening with the Flu d’État.