Join Our Members List For Exclusive Reports






Problem. Reaction. Solution.

I had an interesting insight the other day: the pandemic security theater to which we’re being subjected; the authoritarian lockdowns, the mask mandates, the closed businesses that have bankrupted millions of people – all of this is designed with the purpose of discrediting the whole idea of representative government.

If the people you elect and the government to which you pay taxes will so insouciantly bankrupt you and heckle you about wearing masks, your eventual reaction will be to “burn it down,” as BLM and Antifa are wont to do. It looks like all of us, on every side are being manipulated toward this outcome.

The “solution” is a purely AI-driven technocratic order, where everyone and everything is tokenized and put on the Internet of Things, with as many human decision-makers as possible removed from the equation. An important function of this network would be to disable the ability of dissenters to financially transact, effectively canceling them, as described by Aaron Russo, from a conversation he had with Nicholas Rockefeller in the late 1990s.

Still, one might understand the appeal of a faceless but efficient, automated government, if we could be spared having to countenance the Nancy Pelosis, the Adam Schiffs and the Ilhan Omars of the world perverting the law; the Gavin Newsoms and the Gretchen Whitmers keeping us indefinitely unemployed and the Bill DeBlasios and the Jenny Durkans inciting felons by dismantling the police.

LOCK STEP

We know that COVID-19 is a highly-scripted Globalist exercise, because Mike Pompeo accidentally admitted as much last March and also because it’s evident that governments and media around the world are all following the same script promoted by Internationalist entities, like the UN, the World Economic Forum and the Rockefeller Foundation.

In May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, in which they proposed various scenarios that would put enormous stress on society in order to gauge the response and therefore, to anticipate future trends in technology and development.

The first scenario, entitled, “Lock Step”, describes a world of total government control during a pandemic that would allow national leaders to flex their authority and impose airtight rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded.

Reading what was written ten years ago is like reading the script of what happened in 2020:

“At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”

GOVERNMENT OVERTHROW?

Toward the end of the Lock Step scenario, something plays out, which may be the actual intended outcome of this whole exercise:

“Protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries.”

This film is the latest by TruthStream Media, with many musings on all of the above and everything that’s been happening with the Flu d’État.

 

Contributed by

Contact

You Might Like

Alexandra Bruce

View all posts

3 comments

  • How can democracy work when many modern decisions are highly technical, and the citizenry does not even have the education to make simple decisions on their behalf? The masses are asses. Democracy did not work in Greece and won’t work here.

  • The Gordian Knot is a great analogy for the human brain because it defines each of our own personalities and our own belief systems which is in my opinion easy to understand.
    If we use the Gordian Knot as an analogy comparing it to the human brain then the expression might be that we think we have to chance everyone’s thinking but not necessarily our own personality of how we think. Does the expression that says “I am right and you are wrong” come to mind. If one takes this information from a thinking point of view not physical one then one might understand.
    How is that working in our world of today? I might suggest that our brains have been tied and liken to a Gordian Knot also know as a personality which includes of course all our beliefs. Apparently the knot is our personality, who we are we might say and what we believe etc. So how do we change a belief system and the answer is we do it within us. No one can do it for us. Have you ever tried to change someone’s mind about a topic that they believe in. Right now the example might be Trump vs Biden in the USA elections but maybe not the best example.
    The world shown on this video has some truth to it or maybe even a lot as a world view but it is not the truth depending on one’s level of thinking. It is only the truth for the person who says it’s the truth and its important to try to grasp that thinking if one chooses but then we get into the conversation as too what is truth. Here I will just leave it that.
    So your comment is what do we do about it and the simple answer is change your own mind but not so easy because we have all already being programmed to stay with the emotion, yes.
    Letting go of all emotions is a start. I can hear the wheels turning, what no emotions that is not human and the answer is you are right. What is really funny is that I can give you the answer, which I just have, and you won’t believe me because its your SELF that has to come up with the answer not me. This is only my opinion.
    Might I dare to say it’s your journey? and guess what we each have our own journey believe it or not even the other side that we don’t care for and I have no power over your journey for you to change. Everyone must choose for themselves. That is why the world might be confusing today for most because we think that everyone thinks the same way we do and we tell everyone to change then it will be ok and that is so not true but maybe it’s each of us that has to change our own SELVES!. Change as they say comes from within. Believe it or not!
    If we look at history going back thousands of years we know that this has happened before. The expression is same s..t different pile. History repeats itself can we say. We are at war but just a different war yes. Has that not been mentioned by many at this time.
    Anyway food for thought
    cheers

  • Yes! Have you read HG Wells, The Open Conspiracy, Blue Prints for a World Revolution? I heard about this book from a John Coleman interview. In this book he cites 6 ‘binding restraints’ upon individual autonomy; no. 1 the complete assertion,…of the provisional nature of existing governments and our acquiescence in them;

    (I’ve been researching how the arts are implicated in this age of corruption and I’ve uncovered something that might be relevant). HG Wells was part of an elite intellectual class, privy to this modern religion as he called it. Between the wars there must have been some sympathy for educating the public. Wells got two books out in the 1920s but planned a suite of three, he called his ‘bible’ that would provide the public with an historical, scientific and economic context for this globalist momentum. But after WW2 as we know an era of secrecy clamped down on the public gaining any clear knowledge of their plans. Any literature published after that time had to be a ‘fictional’ account. I have the first of the three books, the historical context. You have to read it several times before it reveals itself but he talks about the embryonic royal houses of Europe struggling to organise after the fall of Rome. He also talks about the immortality religions (the people-as-gods thread). I don’t know how much Integrity he really had, but it is an insider’s account. It also shows how American independence really put a dent in their ambitions.

Most Viewed Posts

Categories