We’re moving into the litigation stage of our information war against the Cabal and Constitutional lawyer, Robert Barnes is representing Brook Jackson in her monumental and historic fraud case against Pfizer and he believes that hers is the only argument that can bring down the entire COVID Hoax. He says:
“What was extraordinary to me was Pfizer’s defense. Pfizer’s defense was not that these allegations are false. They challenge whether the allegations are true but at this stage of the pleadings, they have to assume them to be true legally. Their argument was solely, even if they created a dangerous, ineffective drug that they disguised as a vaccine, that they said would be for the prevention of COVID-19, that didn’t prevent COVID at all, in fact, in some cases, it appears the infection rate, it goes up with COVID, depending on how many booster shots that you’ve had. Not only other dangers of the vaccine.
“The words ‘For the prevention of COVID-19’ are listed as a deliverable item more than a half dozen times in the contract Pfizer signed with the Defense Department.
“And yet, what did they deliver? They delivered something that was not safe. In fact, it was uniquely and extraordinarily dangerous, according to the government’s own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; that it was not effective – as the whole world knows – and, as Pfizer’s own CEO admitted to the European authorities, saying, ‘We didn’t really test for whether it was effective or not.’
“It didn’t prevent infection, it didn’t prevent transmission. We now know, of course, it wasn’t a vaccine, it was a gene therapy. It’s important to note, this Defense Department contract was created at a time when the word ‘vaccine’ still meant vaccine. It still meant something that inoculated and immunized against a disease.”
Listening to Robert Barnes stuns with his articulation of the case and with his fluency in the law. He’s brilliant and it’s like getting a mini legal education, just listening to him.
He gets your head in the game that we all need to playing right now, which is to find ways to sue these Fascist Totalitarian assholes.
At this stage in my life I don’t fear anything, and I have survived many more than the normal numbers of calamities, compounded by the fact that I learned that I was an “Adrenaline Junkie”, because beating the expected odds excited me. I never thought nor worried about their “COVID-19” Plandemic and I didn’t participate. I even paid to have my blood tested for COVID Antibodies; there were none. But then came the Mandates, and I might lose my job, which at 70 I couldn’t afford to do. I trust my Instincts, which is the only reason that even badly used, I am still alive. “It’s not the age, it’s the mileage.” – Indiana Jones
My instincts were very explicit concerning this “Vaccine” (which I obviously didn’t even need).
They told me that if I accepted this challenge, I would not survive. Unlike what “The Terminator” says, “Ah won’t be Bach.” That was quite enough for me.
In the “future”, should the MotherWEFers insist with more Mandates, my answer stands: “NO, thank you.”
Does this concur with the research by Katherine Watt?
No but it’s a way to get a foot in the door.
He’s very clearly representing the DoD’s defense.
You mean Robert Barnes is representing the DoD defense? Explain…
The DoD contracted with Pfizer to manufacture the “Large Scale Vaccine Manufacturing Demonstration”, i.e, the experimental jab prototype via an “Other Transaction Authority”, which is a catch-all category of contracting that was put in place to avoid normally-regulated ways of government contracting and which in this case, “legalized” DoD contracting with pharma companies in order to produce biochemical weapons.
In other words, the vaxx was not contracted by the DoD as a pharmaceutical product that would ever need to be FDA-approved but as a Medical Countermeasure (MCM). A bioweapon.
Moreover, Pfizer did not produce many or most of the elements in the vaxx. These were supplied by defense contractors specializing in bioweapons (see more HERE).
In Pfizer’s motion to dismiss Brook Jackson’s fraud lawsuit, Pfizer referred to this wording in their DoD contract, saying in effect, “We didn’t defraud the government by doing these fraudulent clinical studies, we did nothing wrong because we were only ordered to provide a demonstration.”
Barnes appears to be ignoring all of this and claiming that the DoD stated several times in their contract that Pfizer was to deliver a product that was “safe and effective”. He is ignoring the DoD’s role in all of this. Perhaps for the scope of this case, this is the right tack.
I’m not saying that Barnes is on the payroll of the DoD but the position he’s taking obscures the actual nature of the DoD’s contract, which was to produce a bioweapon. Barnes’ case makes Pfizer responsible for not creating a product that was up to FDA spec but the DoD didn’t contract with them to do that.
Sue? Criminal charges would be more fitting
That’s for sure, if there is a venue/court that has not been corrupted, yet…