The Tore Says show starts at the 5-minute mark.
Tore Maras says that April 4, 2023, is going down in history, because not only was a former President of the United States indicted but it was the first time that an AI prosecutor indicted a human! She was able to determine this by uploading Alvin Bragg’s indictment of Donald Trump into a program that was created to detect AI-generated content. This program can be accessed through a website called GPTZero and you can try her experiment out for yourself.
In addition, her sources tell her that Alvin Bragg’s office used a custom version of another AI called COMPAS (Computational Offender Management Profiling Sanctions) to “find something” on him and more importantly, to select the most Trump-deranged jury possible, that would most likely convict him.
Tore has worked for years in Quantum Predictive Analytics and Programming, which is why she often jokes that she’s a “time traveler”, because this technology simulates time travel, due to its ability to accurately predict the future, based on the immense amount of data it has of the past and the present.
She says that three years ago, she tried to assist Roger Stone by providing him with information she thought he needed for a slam-dunk appeal by demonstrating the horrific situation that every American now finds themself in when heading into court. She says:
The courts in DC use AI-driven software with predictive analytic algorithms to help prosecutors select a jury pool that is most likely to provide the verdict they seek. This software was not only used in DC to select Roger Stone’s jury but a NY State version of that software was also used in the selection of the Grand Jury in the case of Alvin Bragg’s attempts to seek an indictment against President Trump.
With the use of such AI-driven software, the odds are already in favor of the prosecutor from the beginning, as AI and quasi quantum algorithms crunch immense amounts of data to ensure that the state or federal agency is most likely to win. In fact, with the help of AI, Bragg got a document together that was not entirely legally sound or coherent but had a Grand Jury pool that AI selected that was most favorable to indict anything that involved President Donald J Trump. This means that AI is essentially ‘practicing law without a license’…
In summary, in this case, the prosecutor was essentially an AI, as Bragg’s team fed millions of documents that President Donald J. Trump furnished over years of harassment and the AI selected the general pool of jurors that would most likely return an indictment. The ODDS are ever in the prosecutor’s favor.
The question is whether the judge reviewed the document and executed their duty under NY State law to review the evidence, as he is required to do so. There is no regulation in the use of such technology and has not been challenged or addressed in the courts. Is this legal?…
This is the REAL story and should concern everyone. You never know when you might need a job, a loan, or even find yourself in the crosshairs of a prosecutor for something as simple as a car accident or an honest mistake. Unfortunately, from the moment you step into the courtroom, you’re already at a disadvantage with a jury and prosecutor who are already ‘programmed’ to ensure that you’re found guilty, regardless of whether you’re innocent or not. It’s scary to think that I, as an AI, can access John Doe’s social media, banking, texts, emails, calls, voice transcripts, videos, biometrics, health records, and anything else that government and consumer agencies are already documenting, and use it to prosecute him for anything. Every single one of you can be placed in a box. And with the power of quantum computing, the odds will be stacked against you, and your chances of winning are slim to none. This is a horrific assault on our justice system, and the future of our nation looks bleak if this is the normal practice of people in power to persecute those they don’t like.
Our nation has been usurped by very evil people with the help of AI. However, there is a glimmer of hope in that we now have a precedent. We have a precedent for impeaching a President who is no longer in office, as well as a precedent for indicting a former or current President.
