Join Our Members List For Exclusive Reports

Email address:

Your name:

Type this

in the box

Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology used in the COVID vaxx who has become the foremost critic of the mask and vaxx mandates, joins Steve Bannon to weigh in on the validity of the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer vaccine on Monday.

He says, “The New York Times and The Washington Post got it wrong. The authorization is not for Pfizer, the authorization is for BioNTech and it will only be initiated at the time that the BioNTech-labeled product becomes available.”

As Robert F Kennedy Jr writes, “There are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.”

Two letters sent by the FDA, one to Amit Patel at BioNTech (which contains suspicious redactions) and one to Elisa Harkins at Pfizer discuss the new branding and licensing of their vaxx, now called Comirnaty® and also state that there are “insufficient stocks” of the licensed Comirnaty®, but an abundant supply of the Emergency Use-Authorized Pfizer BioNTech product, which although “legally distinct” from one another, they both have the “same formulation” and should therefore be “used interchangeably”.

As Kennedy explains, the legal distinction between the two is that the unbranded Emergency Use-Authorized COVID vaxxes still have the huge liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act, which confers immunity from liability to everyone involved with pushing the vaxx, unless willful misconduct can be proven. He adds that no such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

Under US law, these EUA products are experimental and both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in an experiment and that  it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject.

So, while people have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines, US laws DO permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines, like Comirnaty®. And Globalist puppet, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin wasted no time in mandating vaccines for all of those in the military.

The Comirnaty® product, however has no current liability shield and it is subject to the same liability laws as other products. Kennedy suspects that Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty® vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for it.

The FDA’s weasel words are attempting to gaslight the public into letting Pfizer-BioNTech have their cake and eat it, too or as Kennedy says,

“[This] exposes the ‘approval’ as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates. The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.”

Contributed by


Alexandra Bruce

View all posts


  • On liability – IF the courts uphold the idea of these injections being ‘vaccines’, even though the
    mRNA injections are nothing like any vaccine ever made before AND do not fit the legal definition nor public understanding of what they are getting when they accept a vaccine for themselves or their cild or other family member – then the manufacturers still have ZERO liability.

    Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, the makers of vaccines have no liability. This law was later amended to include all vaccines the CDC recommends, even for adults. Instead, those who are injured or the families of those killed by vaccines can try to have their cases heard by a near-secret ‘vaccine court’. In spite of the fact that almost no one knows about it, and that the normal rules of a court do not apply (the vaccine makers do not appear in this court-like thingy; example: there is no ‘discovery’ where the lawyers for the injured can get information from the makers of the vaccines to help bring out the facts of the case…), AND the bar for proving that the vaccine caused the injury or death is high – this
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has awarded BILLIONS – in taxpayer dollars – to the
    injured parties.

    However – the mRNA injections are not vaccines:
    – They do not contain the virus in any form, nor a part thereof (Live, Killed, Attenuated)
    – These injections do not prevent someone from contracting SARS -CoV 2 o from developing
    – These injections do not stop those injected from passing the virus to others.

    Therefore, the manufacturer should have the same liability as they would for any other
    medical device or drug or medication once they are not covered by the EUA liability
    shield. (It should also be noted that the EUA regulations were not followed properely,
    and the EUA may be invalid. See ‘whistleblower suit’

  • YOU CAN definitely get to the true facts as to what’s in them and I’ll give it to you.
    it may not be WHAT they submitted to the CDC; but it’s the proof…What’s important about that?


    Go For It!

  • Hold on a sec. Why is he even talking about non exsistant varients from u isolated corona virus? He sounds like a shill.

    • Maybe not so much a shill as a scientist who still can’t quite believe that so many other scientists and ‘experts’ are all mistaken, or wrong, or lieing –
      though he obviously NOTICES that the standard procedures are NOT being followed.
      This stands out to someone of his background, training, and experience.
      Find other videos with Ddr.Malone and look up his work experience and you may find
      what he has to say interesting- if only to find out what you want to take a closer look at and do more research on

      Remember, the point is not to trust everything anyone says – but to learn from each of them- always question everything, and dig a bit deeper. After all, it’s our lives, our health, and the question of whether or not we own our bodies that’s at stake here.

      • Dr. Malone needs to get things more straight otherwise he is a part of the problem.
        Too much research leads us into endless rabbit hole

        His experience – as he worked for mRNA tech that clearly had no good purpose – So there’s a problem when he speaks as there’s still some good purpose, which may lead to people misunderstanding that there can actually be a good vaccine or some good use of mRNA tech, and maybe there is really virus (when it was never isolated properly as fact)
        Moreover there is no data to show that vaccine ever worked (other than reports of serious side effects or so called experts “say” it worked or from manipulated studies), you know what I mean?
        I feel like he needs to clear up some matter and stop misleading people (even though that’s not what he meant).

*** Medical Emergency Kit *** Use Promo Code “KNOW” for 10% Off!

*** Medical Emergency Kit *** Use Promo Code “KNOW” for 10% Off!


Most Viewed Posts