Filmmaker and war correspondent Scott Kesterson of the Bards of War podcast is joined by Nate Cain, FBI whistleblower, who leaked incriminating documents about Hillary Clinton’s dealings with Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation.
In 2016, Cain was hired as a cybersecurity contractor by the FBI to provide vulnerability assessments for the FBI’s field offices.
As someone who’d had a security clearance for a couple of decades, he avoided sticking his nose where it didn’t belong but this changed after he overheard his supervisor’s conversation, while at work.
When he confronted his supervisor, “He admitted to me that [he knew of] transcripts of an internal FBI discussion about Hillary Clinton and her case…There was some big discovery.
“Words like ‘treason’ were being thrown around and they were fearful and they didn’t know what to do, so there were discussions about potentially burying this because, the other phrase that really sticks out in my memory was that, ‘This could bring the government down.’ That was one the the fears.
“For me, that was unacceptable. But at that point, I didn’t know if it was true, it was just a rumor. So, I had access to the FBI Net, which is their internal network. It’s classified and I did some simple searches and I came across a trove of information that, at first glance, I was shocked. I was totally blown away.
“There were numerous documents that were evidentiary, that pointed to – and these were documents that had analysts’ notes on them, they had case files assigned to them – and it appeared that there was a major investigation that was going on.
“It involved four basic categories. It involved 1. money-laundering, 2. securities and exchange fraud, 3. public corruption and 4. terrorism financing.
“At that point, I was pretty upset by it but there were case numbers assigned, so I figured that, ‘The FBI’s investigating this, so I don’t have anything to worry about.’
“So I sat on it. And I sat on it for probably several months…
“The whole email scandal thing was a problem, in and of itself and these files that I found had nothing to do with the email scandal…A lot of people have talked about the Uranium One thing but this was so much bigger than that! This involved a lot of countries, which I won’t name, let’s just say that some of them, you don’t want to see money coming into our system from.
“There’s a lot of money running through different shell corporations and shell NGOs and 501 (c) 3s…it was clear that something big was going on, it involved hundreds of millions of dollars, so it was pretty serious.
“Going back to the Hillary email situation, because that plays a part in the story, I was following that pretty intently because in the 22 years that I’d worked with government, I’d had 3 or 4 cases, where I had received an…[interdepartmental] email saying, ‘Don’t delete your emails,” it was basically a subpoena order, saying there were penalties if we deleted our emails and that we couldn’t delete them because there was an ongoing investigation. None of these cases had anything to do with me but they were making everybody in the Command or everybody in that unit hold their emails, as part of a subpoena.
“So, I was very familiar with the subpoena process and understood that if you get a subpoena, you don’t delete those emails – you just don’t. That is Obstruction of Justice.
“I was pretty convinced that Hillary Clinton was going to get charged with something. All the evidence was there. What shocked me was when Comey went out – and this was right after a meeting with Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the tarmac – and then, shortly thereafter, Comey goes out and exonerates Hillary Clinton, saying that, ‘No reasonable prosecutor would go after her for that.’
“And I just – I was completely shocked. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. Especially, because somebody in her position would’ve been trained in classification handling…classification authority.
“They have the right to, at that level, to make things classified and certainly they’re derivative classifiers; they know how to do these things, they know how to handle these things and I saw her give testimony up on Capitol Hill, I’ll never forget, one of the questions that she was asked about wiping her computer and she said, ‘Oh, what, with a cloth?’
“So, she was playing dumb and trying to pretend like she didn’t know what she was talking about and then, Comey, he supported that, talking about how she was unsophisticated with technology and whatever. And so I wasn’t buying it.
“I was pretty upset at that point. I realized at that point, that the highest levels of the FBI – specifically, Comey and McCabe – and I didn’t know who Peter Strzok was at that time…but I knew at that point that there was a cover-up going on and that they had no intention of following through with any of this.
“So, at the time, I decided that I needed to blow the whistle. I thought long and hard about it. I prayed about it. To be honest with you, I was pretty frightened about it, because this was not a trivial matter. I wasn’t blowing the whistle on an EO complaint or something like that, I was blowing the whistle on the very people who could then, turn right around and put me in prison for the rest of my life…
“I was blowing the whistle on information that was related to Hillary Clinton and the reality is, whether it’s a conspiracy or not, there’s an awful lot of people who have been scheduled to testify against the Clinton Foundation or knew information about the Clintons that have mysteriously died, ‘committed suicide’ or had an ‘accident’.
“So, I ain’t gonna lie but the thought did cross my mind, ‘Am I insane?’ because this is gonna put me at serious risk…
Cain then tells the gripping story of how he obtained official whistleblower status with IG Michael Horowitz under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act and he legally transmitted the files to the Senate and House Intelligence committees.
This did nothing to stop 16 FBI agents from raiding his home for six hours on the morning of November 19, 2018 via an illegally-issued court order signed on November 15, 2018 by federal magistrate judge Stephanie A. Gallagher in the US District Court for Baltimore and falsely charging him with illegal possession of stolen federal property.
For weeks, the FBI proceeded to harass Cain and his neighbors, straight out of the Khmer Rouge or the purges of the Chinese Cultural Revolution, determined to get his community to rat him out. His children’s friends’ parents were told they shouldn’t allow their kids to come to Cain’s house, as he was not a “safe” person. These parents were surveilled and their personal emails were read.
Cain says, “They insinuated that I was part of some international conspiracy against the US Government and they specifically brought up Q and asked if they had ever me talking about Q…So now, not only do I feel violated, but all these people who the FBI is visiting and intimidating, they feel violated too.
“They tried to ostracize me from my own community, they tried to destroy my family…I had done this thing that was extremely scary to do; what I believed was the right thing to do and I was treated like a terrorist, treated like an anti-government extremist.
“Mind you, I’ve never been charged with anything to this day. I still have my clearance, it’s never been suspended, not even a flag – because I didn’t do anything wrong, yet these people destroyed my life. I ended up in debt, all of my credit cards racked up and in debt to my eyeballs, all of my savings.
“And it doesn’t even compare to what has happened to Flynn. This is what they do. They force you into a position, to where you can’t even afford to keep fighting them anymore.
“If we as Americans don’t have a right to question our government, then we really are in a police state.”
The one positive to come out of all this, he says his his increased faith in God.
Beware, Kesterson is a convicted felon. He stole $12,000 from a now deceased cancer patient in 2017.
To: All those whom presents may come be seen or known. May life bless and keep you, may life be our pledge and life is victorious, In the name of The Most High, the one and only Omnipotent Potentate, With faith love and works, One is that One is.
Hosea 4:6 “My people perish for lack of knowledge”
Is it not interesting how there is such an abundance of the most expensive thing in the world; ignorance, and the most valuable thing in the world; Wisdom, can hardly be given away for free?
“The enemy is inside the wire my friend and we have been overrun..!”
Greetings, To whom it may concern…
Firstly, Thank you for your precious time and the latitude and honor to so humbly parley. Like the merovigian said in the movie the Matrix, ” you come to me without the WHY, You come to me without power.” I know you probably get a lot of email and this is a lot to read here that I have wrote, but it is something that I have not heard anyone talking about that is the CRUX of the issue we are dealing with. I have sent this to many people and have not received any reply, it is probably a bit too poignant for their sensibilities. Maybe it will make sense to you and you will be interested in discussing it and saying something about it. I would look forward to your communication if you may so desire?
I am an American. I know “who” I am, “where” I am at, and exactly “what” is going on around me and have for many years. I am here speaking about some issues not many other people seem to be paying attention to or speaking about that are very much “Pertinent” to present situation.
It is about the “BONDS”, it is all about BOND slavery, it has been going on since before Moses led his people out of “Bondage” in Egypt..! The immigration issue is about the bonds, more people more Bonds, gay marriage is the same thing, the school system, the prison system, licensing and registration, the welfare system, the “Healthcare system” [ Obamacare was his CASH COW..! ] and of course we have the licensing and registration system, suzerainty..! This is the WHY they want to flood OUR country with immigrants because THEY [The BOND slavers] have depleted the value of the bonds of the American people and they need to “Replenish the stock.” You cannot imagine the identity theft and embezzlement going on in the mortgage and credit card industry; we will get into that later.
This is the same thing that happened before the 2nd world war. They had completely depleted the value of all the bonds of all the people in Europe and they were “Burning the mortgages” by eliminating the people. That is what that was about. That is what would have happened to the American people had Donald Trump not been President. That is the Why the democrats are so concerned about the immigration issue, they are interested in all the fresh BONDS they would be able to create..!
There is so much I could elaborate upon here but I am trying to keep it to a minimal and just get to the point.
Most people just don’t get it about what has happened here in America and how they are being robbed and manipulated. They have had their right to hold “Title” and control over their lives and children stolen from them through the “Licensing & Registration system” by the Corporate federal Government and the “Legislation system.” When any property is “Registered” YOU forfeit Title to the State, they then put that property on their books as an ASSET, that is an INVESTMENT and YOU are a Co-beneficiary of that investment and THEY owe YOU interest & dividends from that investment which they are embezzling. Your signature IS solid GOLD, everything you sign is underwritten, BONDED & insured and monetized. Bond slavery is alive and well around the world..!
Americans are sooo illiterate they have NO idea that they are even being stole from by these blood sucking parasitic PIRATES, Our so called “Government.” Until this is acknowledged and addressed “America” will never be “America” or free, “Constitutional Republic” This is the crux of the SLAVE system [“Suzerain”] that has been implemented on the Federal Corporate United States Slave plantation. Here is an outline of the FACTS… if YOU choose to ignore this, then YOU may as well just go back to sleep.
”No fiduciary should ever be able to wipe out the interests of its beneficiaries.”
Richard A. Epstien, James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Law and Senior Lecturer.
So do you see the connection here..? THIS IS where they are getting the money to fund their CORRUPTION and SEDITION and TREASON against the American people..! if this is EXPOSED it will cut off their money supply just like they are trying to do to everyone and all the alternative media. do you comprehend what I am relaying to you..?
I often hear people speaking about the “Constitution” and these rights and those rights and how they being trampled upon… here are the facts on that..! We don’t have the “Constitution” because the people have forfeited it by signing it away through contracts for benefits..! You cannot go around signing contracts or anything put in front of you and take the benefits and not expect to have your rights taken away or have any obligations for it.
That is just not how commerce works, that is what the courts are set up to do is to enforce contracts. That also goes for all these government agencies as well, including the SHERIFFS dept. When they get government grants they now have obligations to the Federal Government and are under their control. You cannot go around signing your rights away to get benefits and then complain about that your supposed “Constitutional rights” are being infringed upon. The most dangerous weapon being used against the American people is the pen they have in their own hands they are using to sign their names on all the documents “Contracts” being put in front of them thinking they are getting some sort of benefit from…!
Is it not interesting how the Federal Government gets all this money from the public at large and then uses extortionate contracts with obligations attached to them and taking away the people rights when it uses that very money they stole from the “American people” to fund “Corporate policy” and oppress the Public at large..?
William Binney said something in an interview about how all these Politicians out there are not following the founding principles of our “Constitutional Republic” and are committing “Treason.” He said they all took oaths to it [The Constitution] and are not within those said parameters. I believe they think they have just cause to be doing what they are doing and are in fact within the parameters of the founding principles of the “Constitution,” Although they are doing it through fraudulent means [Threat of violence and extortion] and the illiteracy of the Public at large as to what their “Rights” really are. A “Contract” created through fraud is NOT Void, it is “Voidable.”
Here is the “Loop hole” they are using in specificity; This is my little ol’ humble bias opinion in on this subject.
“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.” City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions – As used in this chapter: (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.
The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. The USA became a corporation. Washington D.C. (District of Columbia) became it’s own entity (10×10 mile block).
“The U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the state of the union are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity”. Wheeling Steel Corporation v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L. Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.”
“The delegates to the first Federal convention prohibited the use of Corporations by all Governments representing the American Republic.”
[James Madison journal of the Federal Convention, Vol.2 P. 722]
So now we ask how were they in fact “Voluntarily surrendered?”… Through the “Licensing and Registration systems.” [CONTRACTS] And how can this be you may wonder? Mmmm, well let us take a look at the “Supreme Law of the land”, the almighty Constitution. Article 1 Sec 10 Clause 1. And as far as I am concerned in my little ol’ humble bias opinion is the Supreme law of the land and the “Constitution” in its entirety, Written by JUDGE Roger Sherman, Thomas Jefferson’s right hand man. And supersedes the “Bill of Rights,” The rest of the “Constitution” was written in invisible ink.
Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligations of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
[by the way, ALL attorneys and judges are in fact “ESQUIRES..!” “NOBILITY”] BAR Members, Associates, Closed union shop..! VERMIN as the founding father so eloquently put it. A pestilence on society.!
Article 1, Sec 10 in pertinent part;
“No State shall pass any law impairing the obligations of contracts.”
This sentence is in fact the very crux of the “Constitution” and all commerce, the “Supreme law of the land.” The rest is fluff, froth and garbage. It is also a double edged sword, which means that if there is in fact a “Contract” in place, its terms are the governing factor, but if there is no “Contract” YOU cannot be forced to enter into “Contracting” without your consent.
THERE IS “NO” LAW THAT SAYS YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN ANYTHING FOR ANYBODY AGAINST YOUR WILL..!
UNIVERSAL CONTRACT LAW in pertinent part,
It is essential to the existence of a contract that there should be:
1. Parties capable of contracting; 2. Their consent; 3. Lawful object; and, 4. A sufficient cause or consideration.
The consent of the parties to a contract must be:
1. Free; 2. Mutual; and, 3. Communicated by each to the other.
An apparent consent is not real or free when obtained through:
1. Duress; 2. Menace; 3. Fraud; 4. Undue influence; or 5. Mistake.
17A Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 11 (2004). Moreover, a party asserting the defense of ratification of a voidable contract ordinarily must demonstrate that the releasor intended to ratify the agreement. See M.C. Dransfield, Annotation, Ratification of Contract Voidable for Duress, 77 A.L.R.2d 426 § 4 (1961) (“While a contract voidable for duress may be ratified, either by express consent, or by conduct inconsistent with any other hypothesis than that of approval, still the intention to ratify is an essential element and is at the foundation of the doctrine of waiver or ratification.”); see also Kovian v. Fulton County Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 857 F.Supp. 1032, 1040 (N.D.N.Y.1994) (holding that the issue of intent to ratify a release was a question of material fact). With respect to ratification of a release by conduct, the test is “whether the releasor, with full knowledge of the material facts entitling him to rescind, has engaged in some unequivocal conduct giving rise to a reasonable inference that he intended the conduct to amount to a ratification.” 66 Am.Jur.2d Release § 27 (2001). Where money paid as consideration for a fraudulently acquired release is retained after the releasor becomes aware of the fraud, ratification may be found.
In fraudem legis – In fraud of the law. Every thing done in fraudem legis is void in law.
…SILENCE IS CONSENT…!!!
RELATED TERMS — Fraud; Contracts, torts. Any trick or artifice employed by one person to induce another to fall into an error, or to detain him in it, so that he may make an agreement contrary to his interest. The fraud may consist either, first, in the misrepresentation, or, secondly, in the concealment of a material fact. Fraud, force and vexation, are odious in law. That the contract is voidable rather than void may prove important. For example, an absolutely void contract, it is said, “is void as to everybody whose rights would be affected by it if valid.” 17A Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts §7, p. 31 (1991)
As you can see ALL the Federal corporate Government contracts are all just press ganging, identity theft, bond slavery and extortion, Malem en se..! Can you say “human trafficking..?”
As far as I am concerned I have only ONE “Constitutional” right and that is to hold those whom have taken an oath to it, to the set parameters of it and this is it.
The corporatocracy has stolen the people of “America’s” right to hold Title through “PRESSGANGING” and the “LICENSING & REGISTRATION SYSTEM” and of course “Bond Slavery” this has been going on since before Moses led his people out of “Bondage” in Egypt , this is what the “Health care scam” [Obama care] is about as well as “the Dept of education, the school system, Immigration” and the Prison system… it is all BOND Slavery..!
This how it works…
As I comprehend it, the word “registration” means to forfeit “Title” and anything that is “registered and Licensed” IS [en-titled] to the “STATE” is BONDED and INSURED. Any property that is “Registered” is put on the books as an ASSET of the STATE. They have forced the people to forfeit their inalienable rights [Titles] and right to own property [hold Title] through “Contracts..!” press ganging…! [EXTORTION] “Certificate of Title” means evidence of Title somewhere else, where? With the STATE.! For example the Constitution says we have a right to bear ARMS, it does not say that we MUST REGISTER them with the state, pay a fee or have a license to carry them. That is NOT what the Constitution says. It says; “The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What included is included and what is excluded is excluded..!
Also when anything is “registered and licensed, Bonded and Insured” there is “INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS” Derived from that investment and the party registering the property is a “CO-BENEFICIARY” ON THAT INVESTMENT, and the STATE has been EMBEZZLING those funds..! Not to mention you have forfeited any other “Constitutional rights” you think you may have had concerning that fire arm or whatever other property you “Registered” to the STATE through “Voluntary forfeiture..!” Just stop and think about that for a moment and how many things are and have been registered to the STATE starting with you and your children through the “Birth certificate.” which you and they became “Federal employees and residents of the District of Columbia…!” [Slaves of the US Federal Government Corporate Plantation, wards of the State]… Have YOU ever been PAID for being a “Federal employee..??? deprivation of “Liberty” is $65,000.00 dollars and hour. Tresvant vs. the City of Tampa.
Maxim; “Equity regards the beneficiary as the true owner.”
Due to limits in old Common Law, no remedy was had for beneficiaries if, for example, a trustee ran off with the trust property. To remedy this and protect intended recipients of trust property, Equity regarded the beneficiary as the true (eventual) owners of the trust property.
Equity Jurisprudence had its origin solely in the fact that law (at law/common law) and
Equity were originally two distinct jurisdictions and was administered by separate tribunals. That original intent is not adapted to the current condition of the municipal law, which due to the Judicature Act has obliterated the external distinctions between Equity and the law. Since the inception of the Judicature Act of 1873/1875, the principals of Equity have, over time, taken a back seat to the at law jurisdiction. As Justice Pomeroy stated in the preface to his Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence 1881 :
“There has not, of course, been any conscious intentional abrogation or rejection of equity on the part of the courts. The tendency, however, has plainly and steadily been towards the giving an undue prominence and superiority to purely legal rules, and the ignoring, forgetting, or suppression of equitable notions.” “Even a partial loss of equity would be a “fatal injury to the jurisprudence of a State. So far as equitable rules differ from those of the law, they are confessedly more just and righteous, and their disappearance would be a long step backward in the progress of civilization. ”
The Exclusive Jurisdiction of Equity has the far reaching and broad powers to grant a ruling that is fair just and right no matter the situation at hand, whereas the law is narrow in its scope and limited in this ability. It is this major difference that creates the conflict between the two jurisdictions being administered in one court. Mr. Bouvier, the author of the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, knew and understood Equity. In his book, “Institutes of American Law” he had this to say:
“Law is nothing without equity, and equity is everything, even without Law. Those who
Perceive what is just and what is unjust only through the eyes of the law, never see it as well as those who behold it with the eyes of equity. Law may be looked upon, in some manner, as assistance for those who have a weak perception of right and wrong, in the same way that optical glasses, are useful for those who are shortsighted, or those whose visual organs are deficient. Equity, in its true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of the law; positive law is construed, and rational law is made by it.” 1 Institutes of American Law – 1882, Vol.2, $. 3724, Para. 4
“Between equal equities the first in order of time shall prevail.” This maxim operates where there are two or more competing equitable interests; when two equities are equal the original interest (i.e., the first in time) will succeed. When two parties each have a right to possess something, then the one who acquired an interest first should prevail in equity.
This we affirm with emphasis – the right of appeal to equity by proper bill, and the right of review denovo of an equity case, are just as sacred as is the right of trial by jury. Equity looks specially to the intent, and seeks evidence with respect thereto. J.N. Pomeroy. Equity, in it’s true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of the law” Institutes of American Law 1882, Volume II,§ 372 4, Par 4 Prescribed by a lawful superior. “God is the first superior.” Institutions of American Law, Vol.I, 1851 by John Bouvier.
So as far as the public is concerned, how many contracts are there involved in “Volunteering” to give up their rights [Titles] as “Sovereign Americans” under Suzerain? Mmm, lets just name a few, there are actually over thirty of which all have adhesions..!
1. Birth certificate
2. Social security contract
3. School registration
4. Drivers license
6. Voters registration
7. Business license
8. Marriage license
9. IRS W-4
10. IRS 1040
11. Bank signature card
12. Motor vehicle registration
13. Any and all insurance policies
14. Mortgage loans, Student loans…
15. Etc. etc.
So as you see they have duped America into Suzerainity through “PRESSGANGING, IDENTITY THEFT, [Forced transfer of intellectual property] BOND SLAVERY and EXTORTION”. Can you even just imagine how much funds are being created and embezzled from the public at large “The American People” through identity theft and extortion?
Suzerainty (/ˈsjuːzərənti/ or /ˈsjuːzərɛnti/) is a situation in which a powerful region or people controls the foreign policy and international relations of a tributary vassal state while allowing the subservient nation internal autonomy. The dominant entity in the suzerainty relationship, or the more powerful entity itself, is called a suzerain. The term suzerainty was first used to refer to the relationship between the Ottoman Empire and its surrounding regions. It differs from sovereignty in that the tributary enjoys some (often limited) self-rule.
A suzerain can also refer to a feudal lord, to whom vassals must pay tribute. Although the concept has existed in a number of historical empires, it is considered difficult to reconcile with 20th- or 21st-century concepts of international law, in which sovereignty either exists or does not. While a sovereign nation can agree by treaty to become a protectorate of a stronger power, modern international law does not recognize any way of making this relationship compulsory on the weaker power.
Except through the “Voluntary” [extortionate] licensing and registration system. When you look at it in the true perspective of “Truth” the DOL is nothing more than an agency of organized crime and in total adversity to what is described as the parameters of the founding principles of the “Constitution,” ..! [emphasis added] They have turned our “Constitutional Republic” into a “Corporatocracy Plantation.” [Suzerainity..!]
They have already limited the “Right to travel” through this extortionate “Licensing and registration system.” Now they are attacking your right to “Speak”, the first Amendment, freedom of speech. They have monopolized the information highway and are now putting up road blocks in order to take control of who can say what and when and the how, therefore controlling “Thought.” These monolithic Corporations and “legal rhetoric” are the propaganda of the “Pirates at large,” their legal depts. and their attorneys..!
“LICENTIOUSNESS” — li•cen•tious•ness
1. : lacking legal or moral restraints; especially : disregarding sexual restraints.
2. : marked by disregard for strict rules of correctness
You can thank the BAR association and their army of flying monkeys, i.e. Attorneys and the legislators for this. More raping and pillaging of our nation and freedoms..!
Here is the very first paragraph of the “Declaration of Independence,” it is talking about VOIDING UNCONSIONABLE CONTRACTS..!
The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
[ The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,]
[[[ When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. ]]]
This IS the ONLY way to turn this RAPING AND PILLAGING of our nation and the public at large around by educating people on how to “RESCIND” and “VOID” these UNCONSIONABLE CONTRACTS and “ENFORCING” those people’s rights by doing YOUR job and keeping YOUR oath to the “CONSTITUTION Of the united states of America” and the “Declaration of independence” it is of my little ol’ humble bias opinion that you Sheriffs should also take an oath to the “DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE” if I may so humbly say so…?
It says in Blacks law dictionary under Pirate; “parita es hostis humani generis,” which means Pirates are the enemy of mankind…! and that is exactly what “Attorneys” are.. “Pirates” and they have enslaved the human race into “BONDAGE I.E. BOND SLAVERY” under the guise of the “BAR association.” The “Pirate code “ is TAKE ALL YOU CAN AND GIVE NOTHIN BACK! They ARE the army behind the destructive corporations taking over and enslaving the world, it is NOT the corporations, it IS the Corporate ATTORNEYS AND THE BAR ASSOCIATION and their mindless minions the POLICE… like pimps and bitches sucking the life out of our society…. The public at large…. Think about the scenario above, WE HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY THE LAW ENFORCMENT OFFICERS THAT HAVE BEEN APPOINTED TO PROTECT US… they have been bought and paid for by the BAR association and turned into minions, “Bitches”… And the BAR ASSOCIATION is a fungus, a very deadly Plague and pestilence, an epidemic disease on the population of this planet that needs to be totally and completely eradicated and extinguished. It is all BOND SALVERY, everything you sign is BONDED, and they are profiteering off of it. That is what “LICENSING” is for, so they can profiteer off of any activity you may endeavor in and TAKE possession and control of YOUR property, family, prosperity, freedom and future. That includes your birth certificate, even when you sign your children up for school as well. The public school system operates exactly like the “PRISON SYSTEM”…
When George Bush spoke he did not say the war on “terror” he said the “WAR ON TERRA” [War on earth] go back and listen to him closely, you will hear what he was really saying…
Quotation by Thomas Jefferson: If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…
The “American people” were not party to the “NO interest Contract” that Roosevelt made with the Federal Reserve and the BANKRUPTCY of the United States Federal Corporation to become obligated to pay taxes on the interest of the debt of the “United States federal Government corporation, they were duped into believing they are “Required” to file TAX returns at threat of violence by the organized crime agency” known as the IRS and “voluntarily” contracted into that obligation through ignorance and fear having that LABLE hung around their necks as “Federal employees and residents of the District of Columbia” through Pressganging, fraud, extortion & Bond slavery..! This is a presumption the courts make in order to gain jurisdiction and if you do not articulate that you are NOT, then the presumption is assumed.
The “NO interest contract” being that the Federal Reserve “extended” to the United States “Credit” [No substance] in exchange for payment in GOLD, and the United States “Defaulted” and declared Bankruptcy and is claiming YOU and I are “debtors” liable for THEIR default from more than FIFTY years before any of us were even born..!
Although under article VI of the Constitution says “All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against “the United States” under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
Again we must go back to the “universal rules of contracts” and Article 1 Sec 10 clause 1 of the Constitution. This the “Why” President Trump is going after the Federal Reserve, this is the “Why” Amshell Mayer Rothchild Said, “Give me control of a nations money and I care NOT who makes the laws” this is the “Why” ALL attorneys are FAREBADE form speaking about the bankruptcy. Every court, every attorney, every court case they ARE withholding “Exculpatory evidence..!”
They have taken over the court system, This is the “WHY” we are NOT seeing arrests happening in DC..! Pirates and GANG members will never prosecute their own MEMBERS..!
This the “WHY” the Courts claim to have alleged “Jurisdiction” over the American people..!
The defendant will ask the questions and answer them as he believes the court would have to answer them in order to justify the legal stance it has taken in this case. The following exchange will complete the record in that regard.
Question(s) by the defendant:
1. Did the defendant challenge the jurisdiction of the court over his person in the case at BAR?
Answer of the court:
Yes, but the court considered the challenge to foolish to consider.
2. Did the defendant inform the court of his status as a free man, Claiming his rights under the organic law of this Nation?
Answer of the court:
Yes, but organic rights based on the Magna Carta state a National Constitution were done away with in 1938 when law was blended with Equity and the procedures of Equity replaced those of law.
3. Does not the organic law of this land proclaim the rights claimed by the defendant to be inalienable? How then could they be done away with, by mere changes in court procedures?
Answer of the court:
The United States of America is bankrupt. It was unable to meet its obligation to repay the credit extended to it in gold as per contract, which situation existed in 1938. Rather than admit to bankruptcy, the American B.A.R. Association came to the aid of the politician’s by employing a term that was less understood by the public and they called it the blending of law with equity procedures.
4. Are not common law criminals tried in common law courts and extended common law rights even today?
Answer of the court:
That only appears so. To keep the public in the dark concerning their servo status as bankrupts subject to public policy statutes enforced similarly on the letter of the code. Criminals are seemingly given rights but in point of fact, all that criminals enjoy are privileges under present public policy. America no longer enjoys any of its former rights under the organic law of the Nation but it is ruled by Chancellors, who in conformity to public policy statutes for a bankrupt people grant common law privileges to common law felons. But public policy statutes deny those same privileges to all others. One must understand that public policy statutes are enforced in administrative courts and that they are legislative in the interest of the Nations creditors and it is only incidental if they happen to also be in the interest of the debtor population.
5. Is that why administrative courts of today do not recognize the freeman status of those who have no interest contract relationship with the state?
Answer of the court:
Yes, because they are under an overall international contract whether they know it or not and that contract obligation floats on the Nation’s un-payable debt obligations. Your former public servants, have now become your masters, administering public policy in the interest of the nation’s creditor’s.
6. What jurisdiction did your administrative court exercise in conducting criminal action against the defendant?
Answer of the court:
That was a condition of contract action under the criminal aspects of an admiralty jurisdiction which the constitution of the United States authorizes and public policy statutes support for the existing international default on the debt. It was the international banking system which created the credit which it owned to the people of the United States repayable in gold plus the usury thereof. You the defendant in the case are one of the people caught in this bankruptcy and you failed in a criminal way to perform according to certain public policy statutes which were enacted for the benefit of your and a nations creditors. The administrative court had the jurisdiction asserted over your person and property and that is our final determination.
7. Is it not true that the Administrative court has NO jurisdiction over NO INTEREST CONTRACTS..?
Answer of the Court: YES. ……………………………………………………………………………………………….