Manipulation of Truth in the Digital Age

This is a clip from the Tore Says Show from July 21st, which was nearly three hours long and which I’ve cut down to 47 minutes, focusing on her open-source analysis of the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.

She claims that more people were shot and killed than are being reported and that Trump was shot twice, not once.

The first section focuses on a viral video on TikTok. What appears to be a Marine or a law enforcement officer in full military combat gear, receiving a message and then, positioning himself to aim his rifle at the windsheild of Trump’s SUV, as the latter was escorted into the vehicle by Secret Service, following his attempted assassination.

This was a special effect, using video sampling technology that is 20 years old that has since been improved with Artificial Intelligence technology. What’s insane is that this footage appeared during a live broadcast on NBC News!

In reality, this Marine was, indeed present at the scene in Butler, PA – and he did make those exact movements – but he was several hundred feet away from the SUV, as revealed by a wider angle, taken from the stands and shown in this Tore Says Show broadcast. His original image was “copied and pasted” into the scene.

This sampling technology was pioneered and used extensively in the 2006 underground hit film, ‘The Secret’. For example, in one scene in that film, they dressed three actors in Roman Legion costumes and then, replicated their images several times to create what appeared to be an entire phalanx of ancient Roman soldiers. It’s a form of Computer Generated Imagery (CGI).

I was involved in TV/film production and post-production for many years and I actually wrote a book about ‘The Secret’ and about the then-nascent online streaming, Video-on-Demand (VOD) technology and the guerrilla marketing techniques that completely circumvented Hollywood and enabled this low budget Australian-produced film, to gross over $65 million.

The fact that the Marine’s image was sampled and pasted in front of Trump’s SUV by a special effects technician at NBC, suggests that the technician was either suffering from profound Trump Derangement Syndrome and acted alone – or was following the orders of a Trump-deranged superior at NBC, who is either a CIA asset or otherwise profoundly Trump-deranged and brainwashed.

Regardless, these people at NBC wanted to send the message that Trump is not safe from his beloved military. NBC is a Globalist Hornet’s Nest, whose headquarters and studios are located at Rockefeller Center in Manhattan.

NBC and all of these Mainstream Media outlets who propagandize, berate and lie to the American People daily need to have their Broadcast Licenses revoked by the FCC, due to the unrelenting lies, abuse and havoc that they have wreaked upon the US populace over the past several years. This “Government-by-Journalism” must end!

In the second section of this video, Tore presents the findings of a mathematician who appeared on the podcast of YouTuber, Legally Armed America, who demonstrated that, based on the acoustics recorded at the scene and the angle of the bullets’ trajectories, that the shots which struck innocent Butler, PA rally attendees in the stands and which grazed Trump’s ear were fired from this window, directly overlooking and just a few feet away the rooftop where the FBI claims Thomas Crooks “acted alone” and tried to assassinate Trump. The window of this conference room was clearly open in the SKY NEWS helicopter footage. This window and this building – a mere 400 feet away from the President – was reportedly unguarded by Secret Service.

The mathematician shows how ABC News created a graphic depicting Thomas Crooks near the edge of the right side of the building, in alignment with this window, rather than showing the image of his body (also captured by SKY NEWS), which lay dead, 40 or 50 feet to the left, from where he had been firing his rifle and was shot in the head by Secret Service sniper, John Willis. The latter claims he was told to stand down but he finally refused orders and was later fired for insubordination, according to former DEA Agent and Army Major Jeffrey Prather (Ret), despite the endless denials of the so-called Soros-financed “factcheckers”.

Tore makes additional astonishing claims, based on eyewitness reports from two of her followers who were present at the scene, who told her that a fairly well-known filmmaker, who produces documentaries for a Mainstream Media outlet was seen assembling a 3D-printed .22 caliber pistol and then took the shot which struck Trump on his right ribcage. He was unscathed because he was wearing a bullet-proof vest, regardless of the denials of Rothschild-owned Reuters.

According to one of Tore’s eyewitnesses, this documentarian who shot Trump was taken out by a trooper wearing all-black – possibly, a member of the Beaver County Emergency Services Unit, seen here.

Another eyewitness told Tore that they also saw this filmmaker but “They disappeared. I think they were shot. I didn’t see, because of the crowd, but I can tell you that they never came back for their equipment.” 

Tore believes that the final shot we hear in the mêlée of rounds was the one that took out this filmmaker.

Does anybody out there know a semi-household name documentarian who is MIA?

Below, is a transcript of the final 38 minutes of Tore’s July 21st podcast.

### 

TRANSCRIPT

Tore Maras: I just thought I’d cover a couple of tidbits, in regards to the rally assassination attempt that failed and kind of give you a little bit of a thought about it. Because the thing is, there were many more that were shot. There’s a lot of things that are not being said. 

And as I said, one of them was credentialed – I know a lot of people think that the shots came from the water tower and the roof – but I can tell you, there’s video – I’m going to get this video of a mathematician that actually analyzed the angles. And I could tell you, just remedially, without having done the math, I was focused more on the open source intelligence. 

And then, the question would be, “Who would win?” [Trump’s VP race?] And we obviously know President Trump made his pick almost instantly [after the failed attempt] and didn’t put on the show that he wanted to put on, to show the world who he’s picking. 

That should tell you everything you need to know. There was no selection. There was no discussion. There was just like, “That’s what’s happening.”

I want one more video to share on the assassination attempt, quickly before I end this stream – and the mathematician, of course. But I want to add this first. Here we go:

(Rolls a video that starts with a split screen video of two angles of the Trump Rally in Butler, PA, synchronized to Trump’s speech. The left screen shows attendees pointingt and shouting about the shooter on the roof and the right screen shows Trump speaking at the podium. Roughly 2 minutes in, shots are fired and then, the video becomes multiple different synchronized camera angles of the unfurling events, as Trump and people in the stands are shot. We see the iconic “Iwo Jima” photo being taken from just behind the photographer and Trump being taken to his SUV).

Tore Maras: So, as you can see, there was a lot of time, from the minute people saw it, to the time that it happened. Very quickly. 

And the one thing we can see, as a people – as a people – the one thing we can see is that President Trump, you know, President Trump…was shot. Not once, but at least twice. 

And while everyone saw that there were multiple shooters, right, we saw that they were already targeting the shooter up there before the shots were fired.

Now, the water tower was a backstop. No Secret Service. And not only that, as I said, there was a credentialed member of the media, that is seasoned, not a new person, who fashioned a 22 pistol.

And I think I mentioned, live, without going through the footage – we were going through it together when it happened, that they were talking about bringing a pistol that was fashioned out of 3D. 

Now, let me show you what this mathematician broke down on a YouTube video, because that, my friends, is one of the most fascinating coverages I’ve seen. So, allow me to share that with you now so that you can see it…

(Rolls July 21st video by Legally Armed America, hosted by “Paul”, featuring a mathematician named “John”)

Host Paul: Hey there, guys. In my continuing explanation point. Yes, that’s fine. Let’s start with the first slide. It’s on you.

Mathematician John: So, the first slide is one of the first images that I saw of the shooting of Trump. And this is from some news origin. And one of the things that we see is the orange square on top of the roof of the one-story building and its trajectory towards Trump’s podium.

And so, I saw that and I saw the images, as we see, on the lower left picture, of the body of Crooks’ body, there. And so I thought that that was his shooting point. And so, that’s the information that I want to glean from that slide.

And then, he was taken-out by a headshot from the Secret Service snipers. So that’s the information that I gleaned from this first slide. 

When we move to the second slide, different news entities, for example here, ABC News, they show the sniper in position. Note that the far right of that one-story building, shooting at Trump.

And so, everything was matching up – 

Host Paul: Not to cut you off, John, but where ABC is showing the positioning of the – let’s just say Crooks because that’s who they’re – they’re making the assumption that that is where Crooks was. Yes.

Clearly, we’ve seen in other pictures that that’s not where he was at least once he had been deleted. 

So are they making that assumption – or what do you think they’re making that assumption on, as far as placement, right there? Why do they show that, instead of going of the pictures that show where he actually is? 

Mathematician John: I can’t speak for that. 

(Tore stops the video)

Tore: OK, sorry. I just wanted to pause this, because it’s important for us to kind of take a minute.

This is a guy who has done the math on this. And I have been told by multiple people that, based on the physics and the shooting – and this is the channel, Legally Armed America that put it on – that it [the shooting] had to be done from inside the building, which would mean it would be over here, right, due to the trajectory.

But here’s where a mathematician will break it down for you. Here you go. 

(Rolls video)

Mathematician John: They put him there and that’s one of the things that is hard for me to reconcile, is the position where they’re putting him. So now, we have two different news organizations putting him to the far right of the first floor window. 

And then I saw an image where his deceased body – and this image was from ABC News.It shows his body to the left of that one-floor building. And so I had thought that they had the Secret Service. 

(Tore stops the video)

Tore: Hold on. So as you can see, what he is saying is valid. He is telling you that the body was in a location that he couldn’t have shot. And that’s true.

I mean, this whole Secret Service “sloped roof” thing was out of control. But the angle was bad, because one person shot was 15 feet up. The other one was President Trump was about 10 feet up.

I want you guys to pay attention, carefully. Obviously, we’re working with what we know. The factual things like the position of the dead body, where they are, X, Y, and Z. 

Not all the video footage because, unfortunately, a lot of it is edited.

(Rolls video)

Mathematician John: So here we go. Taking him out with a single shot to the head in the position they were shooting. So my question was, why were people, news organizations showing him to the far right of that one story building? 

So what I did, the best that I could do with the tool set that I had available is I started taking snapshots of Trump’s speech, to the point where I became very close to the moment in time before he was shot and the very moment that he was shot.

And so I tried my best to capture the orientation of his head. Now, there are a couple problems with me capturing it, the way that I did in that I don’t know what the frame speed was of the original image taking the orientation of his head. And then you have the frame speed of the image that’s showing that.

And then, there’s some skew in, you know, the different measurements. So what I did is I took five different measurements. And from those five different measurements, I drew lines and extrapolated for an orientation of Trump’s head out to the unknown, out to the right.

And so what I did is, I dropped the line to the left, dropped the line to the right, and I came to an average. When I came to an average, it pointed at the position that the news organizations were saying that Crooks was in – not to the actual position where his body was discovered. So that confused me even more.

And so I started looking for video to see, well, because the images I were looking at were just the Google Maps, where they really don’t give you the elevation of the building. So given my lines were going to the position that the news organizations were placing him, I wanted to determine, well, what is below that? 

Because certainly, there can’t be two shooters on that roof, one in the position where all the news organizations are putting him, and then the other position where his body was found. And so we go to the next slide to again show that his body is indeed to the far right.

And so then finally, the slide number six, where I have the white line and the yellow line, the white line represents the calculated trajectory that I could do from Crooks’ shooting position, which is where his dead body was. 

And as I drew the line to the left, I discovered from video from Sky News, helicopter video, that there’s a second floor window that perfectly lines up with that trajectory. And not only is there a second floor window, but the video footage clearly shows that that second floor window is open.

And so now, if we go to slide number seven, you can see in that red dotted rectangle that that window is open and anyone can go to Sky News helicopter video showing Crooks’ body. And as the helicopter swings around, it’s very clear to see that the window opens outward and the glass and the frame of the glass are, indeed opened outward. And so that kind of shocked me because common sense would say that you wouldn’t want to leave an elevated window that’s open with a clear line to a Presidential Candidate unsecured.

And so that’s what that is, is that’s an elevated position, a second floor window with a direct line of sight of President Trump speaking at the podium, and the line just happens to line up directly to that open window. 

And so that was kind of disconcerting because, who would do that? Who would leave such a position open and unprotected, but apparently they did. 

Host Paul: And a quick side note on that – not that it would matter – but it seems, again, here we go with another coincidence, that local police department also mentioned when the Secret Service Director inadvertently and incorrectly stated that there were two sniper teams inside the lower building, where Crooks’ body was found.

She was corrected that she was wrong by local law enforcement, who said that those two sniper teams were actually in the adjacent building, which oddly enough is where that window is that you’re talking about. 

Mathematician John: Yes, and when I heard that, so if we go to the next slide, that’s part of the Sky News helicopter sweep. As you can clearly see within that red triangle with open window, you can see the frame of the window is open. So there’s no question that that second floor window was open.

So let’s say that there was a counterterrorism sniper unit inside that. So, we now know that Crooks was on that roof for 20 minutes. So they’re sitting there inside of that window, and they don’t know that he’s on that roof?

Or they’re sitting inside that window and can hear people screaming, “There’s a guy with a gun!” – because, those people right in front of that window, just a little bit to the right. “There’s a guy with a gun on the roof!” And they don’t look out to the window and see him on that roof? 

So, if their explanation to try and cover why an unsecured, elevated window, facing directly, in line of sight to Trump is that there was another sniper team in there, why didn’t they react to Crooks being on that roof?

And so, the next slide, so I saw the open one [window], I wanted to make sure that the logistics worked out. And so the next slide shows the scale of the first building that had Crooks’ body on it to the second building. 

And so what I did is I took a measurement of how tall the first building was up to the roof line and then I colored that same rectangle purple and I stacked them to show that, indeed that second window, as you can see, the shadow on that window, it’s definitely open. That that window is elevated over that roof, so that shots can go through it. 

And the one thing you can see is immediately to the right, there’s a tree. So again, if there’s a counter-terrorism sniper team in that window, why would they pick a place to perch that has a tree immediately to the right, that shields them from a significant field of view, that they would want to be covering? 

So, it wouldn’t make sense to me, but I’m a novice, that a sniper team would be in that window, as a point of protection. But it certainly does concern me, that that window was open and in a building that the Secret Service has described as “unsecured”. 

So if we go, now to the next slide. So this is where I captured the angle. So, I have President Trump, who is looking out to the right at the jumbotron at a chart that’s on there. And that’s the best I could do, to capture the very moment before he gets nicked with the ear.

Then the second screenshot is the very moment that his ear is nicked by the shot. And so, what we do, when we look at this is, because the bullet nicked Trump’s ear, that tells us that the flight is parallel to his head. So basically, if we look at the bill of his cap, President Trump, unknowingly is looking directly along the line of fire at the sniper who shot and grazed his ear.

And as you can see, that movement takes that position to the left, where that second window is, that second floor window, not to the right where Crook’s position is, the moment that Trump’s ear is hit.

And so I show that now in the next graph. That’s the moment that Trump is looking at the jumbotron to his right and slightly behind him, follows the white line.

But when he makes a head correction and turns more to the left, that lines up the bill of his cap to be parallel to that line of fire. 

And again, this is the best I can do with the rudimentary tools that I have at my disposal. 

And then on the next slide, I just show that…

(Tore stops the video)

Tore: Let me say something. As you can see from the line of sight, if he would have stayed straight and didn’t turn, it would have went right through his eye, like, clean shot. He would have been super dead.

He turned his head, just slightly. And it nicked his ear. It would have went right through his eye.

That person was watching intently – and very skilled, I might add.

(Rolls video)

Mathematician John: It’s from what I can do, in my limited ability, that that is the shot that grazed President Trump’s ear came from that window. 

So then, I look to see, “Well, is there anyone else seeing the same thing?? So I saw this excellent video, now in slide 13, created by A.I. Telly.

As you can see, they put the shooter again to the far right. And then, they do the trajectory of his shots. And it’s basically the shot that hits Trump’s ear.

And so that’s the next shot. It shows that it’s 137 meters, 450 feet. The window would be a little bit further behind that.

And so then they show the perspective from the sniper in that position. And, indeed, the tree that we saw in the earlier thing is to the right. It does not interfere with the line of sight to Trump’s position.

And so, based upon the sniper being in that position with the calculations that they did – again, that’s the position that the other news media were putting the sniper at. You can see that at that angle, the bullet grazes Trump’s ear because it’s flying parallel to his head, at that orientation. 

So my independent calculations agree with their independent calculations, that the flight of the bullet came from the area of that second window.

So, again, the next slide shows, you know, the bullet path. And then now, finally, the other slide from A.I. Telly. By the way, they did a great job – again, it shows a sniper there on the roof. That’s where the sniper had to be in order to make those shots. 

But we know now that Crooks was not in that position, that he was to the right, a significant distance.

So, finally, we go to the final slide. And so, it’s not a sniper on the roof in that position. It’s a sniper in that open, elevated, unsecured window with a direct line of sight of President Trump that was left unsecured.

Host Paul: So, quick question here. I know in our offline conversation we discussed this. The distance, roughly, that you’ve calculated that the actual shot came from on top of that, not on top of the roof, but from the window, how far was that from actually where Crooks’ body was? 

Mathematician: John I don’t have a distance in feet but just from looking at it, it’s 50 to 60 feet, Crooks’ body, from this shooting position, where the line lines up with the second floor window. 

And so in the final slide, I just show a composite of different pictures and one of the pictures is a shot, an image of Trump from behind. Again, if you look at the bill of his cap, the bill of his cap at the moment he was shot – and I tried to capture it from this video that was taken from behind him – is pointing directly at the position of the sniper that grazed his ear. 

Host Paul: Which, also, if you look, based on what you’ve already stated, you were saying he was looking at the teleprompter, and you can see the teleprompter just to his right, and it does appear that he’s looking directly at it.

Mathematician John: Yes. He just barely had turned his attention to the teleprompter, and barely away from that Jumbotron, and that little movement of his head saved his life. 

Host Paul: One of the things that – and I appreciate you doing all this work, John – this is pretty incredible work, I’ve been looking at lots of other videos, trying to piece some things together, and to just answer some questions in my own mind, not necessarily to put out to other people. 

But what confirms what you’re telling me is that same video, they’re talking about the report of the actual shots, right? 

When you listen to the video from Trump’s perspective, the main video that everybody has seen, where Trump’s in the picture and Trump’s speaking and looking at the teleprompter and whatnot, the rounds do sound a little bit different. But they’re also very similar, because they’re all coming from a distance.

So they’re getting – the bodies are absorbing some of the sound, as far as the crowd. It’s also reflecting off of metal buildings, rooftops. There’s so much going on that’s playing with the sounds, as they come from a distance.

However, there’s a video that I looked at early this morning, that lines up with what you’re saying because, it’s a video of this group of people who spotted that shooter just to the side of that building. We’ve seen the video a hundred times now where, “Hey, he’s got a gun, he’s got a gun!” where people are – they saw the guys go up the building, they saw the guy on top of the building, and they’ve got pictures of the guy on top of the building. 

Well, this is the first video that I’ve seen of the actual gunshots being fired from that same position, and the first three shots are distinctly different in sound. And I’ll explain a little bit further. 

The other shots sound like either a smaller caliber or they’re farther away than the first three shots. And then that one more. 

(Host Paul rolls video of Dr Chris Martenson’s audio analysis)

Dr Chris Martenson: That’s the six I’m unclear on. Let’s listen to this again. Muffled, and then – right? That’s what I hear.

(Tore stops the video)

Tore: And that’s what I said on the day; that one of the shots didn’t sound like a long gun, meaning like a sniper gun. And this coincides with what an eyewitness said, that someone that’s media – fashioned a .22, which I believe is what hit President Trump on his body, but he had, like a Teflon vest, so he was fine.

(Rolls video)

Host Paul: I can tell you this, people are going to say, “Oh, that was the sniper.” 

Well, there’s disparaging stories. First of all, they say the sniper shot one time. So, the counter-sniper fire should have only been one round, and that one round came much later after that first eight or nine shots. 

So, they’re saying that the first eight or nine shots –

(Tore stops video)

Tore: Okay, so here’s the thing. Eyewitness testimony about the pistol, which I believe is more likely a .22, and someone else said it, too; one of the witnesses said that. 

I believe that…the last far shot we heard was the shot shooting down this media person from a Mainstream Media outlet. 

(Rolls video)

Shots were from Crooks.

But when you listen to this audio, and of course I’m going to be playing this, it’s very obvious that, not only are those first three rounds different, but even – it almost makes you wonder if there’s even a third gun, because there’s a third different sound. 

(Host Paul rolls Dr Chris Martenson’s video)

Dr Chris Martenson: And then that one more, that’s the sixth I’m unclear on. Let’s listen to this again.

Muffled, and then kkkkk – right? That’s what I hear. 

(Host Paul stops video)

Host Paul: The reason why I will point out, again that this, I feel like backs up your claim, that a shot was fired, at least some shots were fired inside a building inside a window, is because the first three shots that we hear from the side of this building – 

(Tore stops video)

Tore: So the first shots were coming from a more enclosed area. It’s like – So that’s key.

So the shots, the first three shots, which took out the people behind, you know, on the stands and nicked President Trump’s ear came from there. 

But there were more shots. 

(Rolls video)

Host Paul: Do not have an echo, which would indicate it being fired from inside a building, and the inside of the building would have captured all that sound, not allowing it to bounce off the walls and the rooftops and things of that nature, where if you notice, the other reports that come out after the first three shots do have an echo.

(Host Paul rolls Dr Chris Martenson’s video)

Dr Chris Martenson: Here’s an interesting thing: One, two, and three, besides being muffled and further away, it doesn’t have echoes. 

Here we have – this is a shot here, this one, this peak…So this here is a shot. This is an echo. Very clearly, an echo. And a shot and an echo and a shot and an echo.

So this is actually critical evidence, because you hear that, “kkkkk”. There’s echoes coming off. So that also allows us, again, to analyze where was this gun? 

But first up, we just have an absolutely different sound between the first three. There’s no echo. It’s much further away. It’s more muffled.

It’s just not in the same place, at all. 

But these next ones, very different sound. Totally different weapons.

Okay. Full stop, we have two separate weapons. Plus, we have no echoes coming off of the first three, and then we do have echoes coming off of the next set.

And that last one, “k”. That’s different. That’s not the sniper shot. 

(Host Paul stops video)

Host Paul: That would certainly indicate to me that at least the first three shots were closer to where this video was shot and were inside something, which captured all of the echo. What are your thoughts on that? 

Mathematician John:I agree with your analysis. I also listened to that video and to the explanation that the audio expert gave. And I would agree that there was more than one shooter.

And I think that these are some of the questions that we need to extract from the Head of the Secret Service, when she testifies before Congress next week is: How many shooters were there? And then, how many shots did they fire? How much brass, as we talked about when we were discussing earlier, did they collect from Thomas Crook’s position? And then, why was that second floor window with a clear line of sight to President Trump? 

(Tore stops video)

Tore: And I just want to say, you guys can watch the rest of the video, right? So I just want to say, you obviously can already surmise that my ass is going to be getting this information to the right people in Congress, so we can ask questions about the shooter that no one’s talking about, about the person that is missing in action. 

And I’ll put that out on Tuesday for you to see and digest and see how this strongly worded letter may indeed end up giving us the real answers. 

[Tore has set that video to private and she has not published it to Locals, where I’m a paid subscriber and she has blocked me from commenting or reading the discussions on her Telegram Channel, so I have no further information on this].

Tore: The concern that I have is, I’m not a weapons expert at all. At all. But I do know what I hear. 

I’ve heard many a guns being shot before. And I can tell you that there, I said, “There’s more than two shooters,” on day one. Now, we’ve gone from one to two, right? 

But I’m telling you there’s a third and they were there flanking the President. And let’s not forget the shot. The bullet shot on his Teflon. And that’s probably the delayed one.

Because, according to one eyewitness, that person was shot dead by someone in black and a State Police person. 

And another person said, “They disappeared. I think they were shot. I didn’t see, because of the crowd, but I can tell you that they never came back for their equipment.” 

So we’ll see. I’ve been saying there’s multiple.

There were probably more. But we don’t know if they paused, because they couldn’t. But this is really important for all of us to understand, that no matter what we are analyzing, we are analyzing information from influencers and even people that are posing as average people. Or Mainstream Media that can and most definitely have skewed video. 

They can do that shit live. And therefore, this is why I showed you the video in the beginning. Where everyone on the Mainstream Media is showing this soldier, literally placed in front of President Trump’s vehicle, showing that this kitted-out guy is getting a message [through his earpiece]…points the gun to the car and then backs off. 

But then, when you look at other video, you don’t see the soldier. And you see him, far in the corner by a building, getting a message and doing the same movements. 

So the question you should be asking yourself is, “Why did the Mainstream Media do this?” 

To make it look like an inside job, right? Do you see where I’m going with this? 

And therefore, President Trump had to make a rush decision. Do you understand? 

Mainstream Media even had one of their own in there. Shooting. 

So, that’s kind of fascinating to watch, if you ask me. 

Because every time something happens, do you know what the first question you should be asking yourself is? “Who benefits from this? Who benefits from this happening?” 

Tell me who benefits from it and I’ll tell you what the motive is.

So who benefits from this? Who benefits from it? That’s key. Who benefits from the shooting? What was the outcome that was received after that? 

Good question. Anybody want to take that? What was the benefit? Ah, selecting JD Vance!

And I’ve told you how I feel about him. No need to go back into it. And it was very instantaneous, wasn’t it? It was almost instant that that happened; you know, the selection of JD Vance. And one might say he was bullied into it. 

I’ll tell you what. One thing I’ve learned in my career is that sometimes, you roll with the punches to see where they take you. 

But by no means does that mean that you accept it. And you rely on your people, The People, to ensure that this is rectified.

And this is why it’s important that all of you “See something, say something.” 

Funny. I held a whole show where I showed those videos of what to do when you see something, what to do under riot things. They were posted on the channel, right? They were posted on the channel for you to see.

They were there for you to see. So you must ask yourself is, “OK, so obviously we know that this is going to happen. So what can we do?” 

Again, “See something, say something.”

If you go to a rally, make sure you’ve got battery. Make sure you can record. Make sure, once you do that, once you’re in there – and I urge everyone…keep your phone on airplane mode, take off your Bluetooth, and then Record.

Because another thing that someone can do – and it’s been tried and tested – they can enter your phone and delete your sh!t before anything. 

So, if you actually want to have footage that maintains itself: Bluetooth off, Airplane Mode on, you record, and you get to a hard drive, and you extrapolate, then you can turn your phone on. It’s pretty simple.

That’s it. That’s the simplest thing.