TRANSCRIPT (STILL ROUGH)
Crypto Rich: Donald Trump promised no wars under his watch. Why on earth is this anti-war president doing what he’s doing in Iran? What is it about Iran that he’s attacking? That’s what we’re going to talk about in this video.
Hey Roxanne, thank you so much for making yourself available. Thank you for having me. You are so welcome once again.
We did this fabulous conversation about Operation Gladio that kind of blew my mind about the depth of it. And one of the things you said to me before we started recording that video was that how Iran is caught up in it, as well, in some way. And I just want to say you are Colonel Towner-Watkins and you did a lot of studying into Operation Gladio. Yes. Like, I mean, when we recorded that original video, which I do recommend people go and watch, I think it could have gone on for 12 hours and we could have gone into all sorts of directions.
Colonel Towner-Watkins: Easy. Yeah, without you needing to pause for breath, I might need to stop you and say, hold on, hold on, let me keep up. OK, so I supported Donald Trump because, in his first term, he didn’t start any new wars.
He did very small, short, kinetic actions. And then about a week ago, we’re recording this now on Saturday, the 7th of March, on Friday, the 1st of March, I think it was on the 28th of January, he started bombing Iran. And he’s still bombing Iran, as far as I can tell.
It’s difficult to tell with all this news and everything, right? This makes no sense. Dropping bombs on innocent people. And then the Iranians are dropping bombs on Israel and other places, apparently.
And I don’t know whether Israel is dropping bombs on other places or the US is. It’s, you know, the fog of war, but what a mess. This isn’t like a clean operation like Maduro to extract Maduro.
Why is that? Do you know why that is? No. So if you look at Venezuela, and let’s just talk about that one in a little detail. So when the Chavez revolution happened in 1998, and he kicked out the CIA, he kicked out all of these nefarious players.
There was almost an immediate, in the early 2000-2002 time frame, then again in 2004, attempt to overthrow his government. Okay, so that tells me just from my Gladio background, that he was not playing in the global order, right? So you fast forward to Maduro’s government in 2019, during the Trump administration, Pompeo and Bolton orchestrated a coup against Maduro, and they temporarily recognized Guaido as the… Yeah, okay. Very funny.
Yes, it was, except that during that interim period of time, when the US financial markets was recognizing Guaido, he basically, they basically collectively took Sitco in the United States and billions of dollars from the Venezuelan government as a part of that. What’s Sitco? It’s a gas station. Right, okay.
Yeah. So, and there’s lots of details there, but just at the 30,000 foot look, Maduro obviously stayed in power. So if you need to take Maduro off the chessboard, and you have people that are in that administration that’s willing to work with the US government in doing that, you diffuse, whether you want to say it’s right or wrong, you diffuse the use of Venezuela as kind of this straw man, because what happens is this Gladio operation goes, because of the cocaine in Latin America, they were using Venezuela as a boogeyman.
So no matter any CIA person, media person, they all focused on Venezuela because they didn’t control it as being the boogeyman, right? All the drugs are coming from Venezuela. There’s a book here that I’m just finished reading called Stolen Elections. It’s written in large part by a CIA guy.
He not only blames all of the stolen elections in the Venezuela, but they literally say in that book that Maduro is running the largest drug empire in the world. I just told you who was doing it. It’s the CIA, not Maduro.
But by taking Maduro off the chessboard, and you see him kind of waving to everybody like he’s going to Club Med as opposed to going to jail. And you have a infrastructure inside of Venezuela that you basically took that excuse off the board. They can’t say it’s Venezuela anymore.
And what happens in the immediate aftermath? Today, they’re hosting that large coalition of Latin American countries and South American countries that are dead set on getting rid of the narco-trafficking in the Western Hemisphere. So it allows you to go to step three and four and five without having this entity here that is the perpetual boogeyman. So if you move to the Middle East and Iran, who’s the boogeyman in the Middle East? Iran.
They blame literally everything on Iran. No, no, I’m talking about of the Muslim countries over there, right? From America, Iran is blamed for everything. Hezbollah, ISIS, everything.
Well, I can get Hezbollah and Hamas. I don’t get ISIS. I’m sorry, Hamas, not ISIS.
But even then, if you go back and look at the original funding for Hamas, it was Israel that funded Hamas against the PLO. It was not Iran. I’m talking about the narrative, not necessarily the reality, right? So we have been conditioned with propaganda to believe that, and especially in America, Israel can do no wrong and Iran can do no right.
Those are the paradigms here. That’s the message. But again, I just told you that when Mossad was helping train the Sabaq in Iran, they helped create the monster.
Okay, no, you didn’t in this video. That was the other video where you said it was the CIA. The CIA helped set up General Norman Corkum Sr. Yeah, MI6, CIA, and a few years later, Mossad began helping train the Sabaq agents that were torturing people, kidnapping people, tracking people down, all of that stuff.
They were all involved in Iran. And for people who don’t know, Sabaq was the intelligence service under the Shah of Iran. Very, very brutal, brutal.
Yes. Okay, so you set the conditions for this, what I would consider an evil empire under the Shah. You have a revolution.
Now, as I have said often in other videos, anytime, and it was true in Iraq as well, Saddam Hussein had an account at the bank we talked about in the previous video, BCCI. He’s part of this whole CIA apparatus. He’s controllable.
He was also installed against a sovereigntist leader before him. Yes. Okay.
That’s the paradigm. So the CIA is very good at planning successors, right? So if the guy gets off at like Noriega and Panama, he was on the CIA payroll too. But oftentimes these, because they’re corrupt, that’s why they’re there.
Sometimes they get a little too big for the riches and we have to do away with them. Okay. And we have, so they’re always grooming the next guy.
Saddam Hussein found out that his minister of defense, whose name I can’t remember off the top of my head, was the next guy being groomed and he killed him. So you’re working with very corrupt people. All right.
And from the Iran perspective, I found it very rich after understanding Gladio and the real control that governments have of who’s residing in their countries, that the Ayatollah was plucked out of France, a member of NATO, part of Operation Gladio and stuck into Iran during their revolution. Yeah. Now I remember him flying in from Paris.
Yes. In fact, it was before I was born, but I still remember it. And he lived in France for 15 years or something like that.
And that was just out of the compassion of this Western democracy, taking care of this political asylum seeker. He was a refugee. It was very good of the French people to look after him like that.
Yes. And then he just mysteriously shows up in the middle of this revolution and you’re, you know, so there’s a lot more research that needs to be done on that aspect of it. But you basically have the perpetuation.
I was shocked when I started looking into the amount of trade that France did with the Ayatollah and that the UK did with the Ayatollah and that Germany did with the Ayatollah. And as I mentioned to you in the other video, in 1980s, during the Iran-Iraq War, who was selling Iran missiles? We were. Twice, at least, large shipments.
And do you know who we brokered those missile sales through? Israel. I didn’t know that. Yes.
The Iran-Contra scandal and Oliver North. Those missiles transited Israel. U.S. Western missiles.
Okay. So they went from the U.S. to Israel to arm Iran. Yes.
And the CIA, possibly with Mossad and maybe MI6 involvement. Yes. All of them.
Tracking the whole thing. Yes. Done with the knowledge, I expect, with certain aspects of the U.S. government.
Yes. State Department, military. He was involved in Reagan’s government at the time.
Yes. Okay. So if you understand that history of Iran, Iran was given the same option as Venezuela was given.
Stop it. Stop it. Don’t do this anymore.
Ayatollah, go back to France. Go live somewhere else. Okay.
But what’s Iran doing still? Were they still dealing in drugs or something? No, no. I think what happens is the negotiating team goes and says, you have, and they did, fund Hezbollah. And you’ve done some not good things.
And we want all of that to stop. Okay. Sorry, go ahead.
And Iran can say, okay, we’re going to stop. Because I believe the peace president, as you described him, Trump, wants all of this shit to stop. Because it’s destabilizing everything.
You can’t have true peace in the Middle East with the threat of Iran continuing weapons grade uranium enrichment and it always being on the table. So regardless of it’s not happening in five days and all that other crap, that’s all garbage. But Iran could have come to the peace table and sat at the adult table.
They decided to come to the table and sit at the kids table. They were not going to participate in this peace coalition. They just weren’t going to do it.
Okay. But here’s why, because they’ve got legitimate reasons not to, because they’re supporting Hezbollah, which are this legitimate resistance group in order to protect the Lebanese people from the colonialism, from this military base that the British have deposited in Palestine in order to shit stir that goes out killing innocent Lebanese people and Hezbollah, we’re not going to put up with this anymore. We’re going to fight in self-defense.
So I, I understand that part. And I find that fascinating because I can’t argue that point and I’ll tell you why. When, when I first started this research, I had been brainwashed in that Che Cabrera was this awful person.
He helped the revolution in Cuba and he kept showing up at all of these really inconvenient for the CIA places throughout Latin America, helping the indigenous people fight against the colonial powers or the overthrow of legitimate governments. He showed up in every one of them. And I realized that the propaganda that circulated around Che Cabrera was, he was a pain in the ass to the CIA.
It was a freedom fighter. He wanted indigenous people to be able to rule their own lives. Yes.
But the propaganda in America was he’s this guerrilla that is basically, you know, a communist. They love putting that label on everybody and that he’s the destabilization force when it was actually the exact opposite. Right.
So an equivalent in Britain might be, it’s a bit dated, but not as dated as your example. The ANC in South Africa were terrorists, but according to the mainstream media and the British government, but also by those who anti-apartheid people were like, well, they’re freedom fighters struggling for liberty from this racist state. So there’s two sides to that argument, right? So same deal with Hezbollah, two sides, right? Correct.
So again, there are other ways to deal with Lebanon. And I believe that’s what all of these chess moves are all about. So the, but back to Iran proper, I think that there was, I don’t even know how to say this because this is all speculation on my part.
Obviously we don’t know this. I imagine that there’s a threat in the Middle East and I imagine that threat to be the potential of a false flag. And just like, I think that’s what Venezuela was being set up to be used for in the Western hemisphere, the potential of some type of nuclear, whether it’s a tactical nuclear weapon or a dirty bomb, which we’ve already known Ukraine had at least three opportunities to use that against Russia.
It’s been reported by not mainstream, but reliable sources that that was there and they were going to blame Iran for it. And it most likely would have been against Israel. And so I think there’s conversations that were had that we want all of this to go away.
And whatever reason Iran decided they were not going to be part of the solution and then lob some bombs and just kind of as a explanation point, no, we’re not playing with this. And I think that’s what evolved into what we’re seeing today. Because in order to make this whole thing work, you have to have adults at the table that recognize the real source of destabilization is these errant regime change artists that go around creating these false flags.
What I find most interesting is the UK’s response to all of this. Okay, we’ll come to that. That’s very, very interesting, right? That was like, no, no, there’s something wrong about this.
There’s something else going on. So I imagine that there are WMDs in Iraq, and therefore we have to go in before they launch missiles that can reach England in 45 minutes. No, I imagined it.
I imagined it, right? It sounds a bit like that. And I did say I was going to push back. No, I’ve got something else to offer you, Roxanne.
And I want to go to the trade that you were talking about, because you did mention something else. I interviewed Barbara Boyd last night from, it’s not out yet, as we’re recording this on Saturday, the 7th of March, from Promethean Action. And one thing she told me was about, that’s right, you make a note so that you watch that video and subscribe, comment, and like, okay? When it comes out, and everybody else as well, right? So Barbara Boyd from Promethean Action, they do really, really great work.
She said, so one, the Iranian regime was born out of the Muslim Brotherhood. And the Muslim Brotherhood was a creation of the British in order to shit-stir, because that’s what the British do. They like to shit-stir and keep everybody divided and fighting amongst each other so they can’t unite against their imperial overlords.
And that Mike Steger, also from Promethean Action, in the short video he posted last night, said that he said that the Ayatollah Khomeini’s sister said, if you look under Ayatollah Khomeini, the first one, if you look under his beard, you will find the British flag. Oh, that’s interesting. And then Barbara Boyd referred to this book called Hostage to Khomeini, which is out of print, but you can find it on internet archive and download it, which gives documented evidence, like independent verifiable evidence, money trails, that show how Khomeini’s connections to the CIA and MI6, and I’m referring to what you said earlier, how these intelligence agencies, okay, this puppet is no good, we got the next one lined up.
And what Khomeini did, because Barbara was saying this, that the Shah, towards the end of, one of the reasons they wanted to get rid of him is he wanted to industrialize Iran, and have nuclear power, and then promote that model to the rest of the world. Well, the last thing the European elites want are strong nations in the rest of the world, with their own independent industrial economies. So he had to go.
And then they were, okay, well, we’ll put in this Islamist Khomeini, who will keep the country primitive and feudal, in the same way that the Taliban have done with Afghanistan, which before they came to power, was a civil society, you know, where women went around in skirts and everything, and there was rock and roll music or whatever, right? People were free. And it was still Muslim, but like a sort of Turkish Muslim. So then Iran, under Ayatollah Khomeini, has kept the country’s development suppressed, serving the interests of the British elites, or the European elites.
And then you talked about the trade ties between Britain, Germany and France. And I heard you mention on a video, I wasn’t able to listen to it in full, crypto AG. Now, I started off as crypto rich.
So I thought you’re talking about some, some cryptocurrency going on between Iran and Britain, right? What’s crypto AG? So take it there, because that’s not something I’ve heard, I’ve heard anything about. No one talks about it, because it’s CIA. Talk about it.
So go back to World War Two, crypto AG was used during World War Two, the guy was originally Swedish, he set up a company, he comes to work with the NSA during World War Two, all of that stuff happens. It’s a cryptology equipment that allows you to communicate, so no one else can, you know, tap into your communications. So after World War Two, the CIA helps him set up a company in Switzerland, because they’re neutral, right? But the technology actually has a backdoor to it.
And so as long as he’s there, and he hires, it looks like a legitimate company, he hires salesmen, they go all over the world, 120 countries, buy this encryption device that allows them to communicate internal to their country, encrypted, and to their embassies around the world. The CIA had a backdoor the entire time. So if you think about this, from 1945 until 2020, when Donald Trump got rid of them, got rid of the CIA or crypto AG? Crypto AG, okay, 120 countries, the CIA knew everything they were saying to each other the entire time.
So all of these surprise things were never a surprise. So as this guy gets older, he has a son that works at his company, but they didn’t trust his son. So they arranged with this old man, that he’s going to sell his company to this entity that is a CIA proprietary, but it looks legitimate.
It has an office, it has a staff, but they’re just on the payroll. And this crypto AG company maintains this arrangement, but the German BND decides to go in, that’s ran by Reinhard Galen, the guy that set up the stay-behind units for Hitler. Okay, German BND, the German Intelligence Service.
The German Intelligence Service. Okay. So now the Germans have a backdoor, and the CIA has a backdoor.
Now, eventually that goes on for several years. Eventually, the German BND, Galen’s gone, they decide they’re out. So then it becomes, again, just a CIA proprietary company.
What did they use the information for that they gained this way? To ensure that they had situational awareness of everything that was going on in the world. And I want to make sure everybody understands the implication of this. So the entire time the CIA is saying that Guatemala had communists in them, they knew 100% Guatemala had never communicated with Russia, ever.
The whole time that they’re talking about this communist Tudor party in Iran, they knew 100%, it was less than 1% of the population at the time, it was never a threat. Every single coup, Indonesia. So Indonesia, if you understand that the president of Indonesia is communicating with other heads of state through these encrypted devices, and you know that Sukarno is setting up this neutral neutrality pact with Libya and all of these other independent countries, you know you’ve got to get rid of him.
So you have global intelligence of everything going on in the world by the backdoor to this crypto AG company. Wow. How do we get a cut of this, Roxanne? You don’t.
No, I know. We’re not in love. Okay, that would include the United States, the UK, Australia, the European Union nations.
Now, interestingly enough, because they have five eyes, they spy on each other already. So I don’t know that Australia ever had crypto AG, but they don’t need it, because they share the intelligence already. They have access to it.
They have other systems. But these other countries, Iran being one of them, and Iran caught them doing this. So there was an incident about 10 years after they had bought into crypto AG, where Reagan said something, and Iran knew that they had not said anything.
They continued to use it. They held one of the salesmen hostage for a year and required a million dollar payment to release him. And crypto AG, the CIA, tried to make that employee pay the million dollars back.
That’s how evil these people are. So it’s just so important for us to understand how big this operation is. So I want to go back to what you were saying about the British relationship.
You remember when Trump took out Soleimani? Yeah. Wasn’t that supposed to be a joint assassination with Israel? And don’t you remember Trump saying at the last minute that Bibi Netanyahu pulled out? Okay, I don’t remember. Carry on, please.
Okay, so that happened. So to your point about the Ayatollah being very close friends to the British, you also have a relationship with the Republican Guard. The Republican Guard, in my estimation, if you look at the remnants of what was left of the SAVAK, basically all the Republican Guard did was change the name of the outfit and kill a couple of the guys at the top.
The apparatus was left in place. Okay, so SAVAK evolved and the change in name became the IRGC. Basically.
Okay. Basically. Right, right, right, right, right.
Okay. So if I take out this Islamic force. So if you have this arrangement with Israel and the UK in this basically propping up of Iran, and I think you misunderstood when I was talking about the dirty bombs.
I’m not suggesting Iran was going to be the one doing it. I’m suggesting that it would have been a Gladio operation, where potentially if Israel was a target, it’d be Israel doing it. They kill their own people and blame Iran.
Yes. So if you can’t get Iran underneath the umbrella of the peace movement, then you have to change Iran. Because we can’t allow Iran to be continued to use as the British and the Israel’s boogeyman anymore.
Okay, but the troublemakers Israel, they’re the one who could have done this false flag. They’re the one that going in killing people in Gaza and stealing. I agree with you.
But do you think if you said that to the world population right now, they’d believe you? But before, before this latest assault on Iran, Trump could have. Why didn’t Trump do that? No one’s going to believe him in the United States. No one is going to believe that Israel is the bad guy here.
There has been hundreds of billions of dollars in propaganda and psychological operations inside America, that we’re all going to die if we don’t support Israel. Isn’t that changing because of the the assault, the killing of all these Gazans, the Palestinians, the Gaza genocide? There’s a faction, but the media and the CIA basically marginalizes them as it’s like the Vietnam War protesters. You know how the psychological operations to marginalize them? That’s exactly what’s happening here with anyone that stands up for Gaza.
There is a collective psychological operation to immediately marginalize them. And I would go so far as to say these campus supporting of the PLO and all of that stuff that was happening on the campus here, none of that’s organic. That was all done to marginalize the people that honestly think there’s a genocide going on in Gaza.
And they did the exact same thing during Vietnam with the American people. There was legitimate, well-dressed college students that were protesting and very articulate, making a valid argument why we had no business being in Vietnam at all. It scared the shit out of the CIA because they were using that to set up the Golden Triangle and take over the opium production in Laos and blah, blah, blah.
OK, so you can’t have those guys be effective. So what do we do? Well, they orchestrated, they created and funded the National Student Association. Gloria Steinem was on the CIA payroll.
If you go back and you look at the hippie movement, the entire thing was orchestrated. The LSD experiments, give people drugs, you know, tune in, sign out, whatever that saying was. They completely infiltrated those movements to delegitimize them.
So now when you think about anti-war protesters for Vietnam, people immediately say they were all hippies. They were not all hippies. There were a lot of very articulate, well-spoken college students that were protesting the Vietnam War.
But that’s not what the after effect was. That’s what’s happening in America today with the Gaza situation. So again, you go to Iran and you say, look, this is the real deal.
This is what’s happening. And we need you to be part of this coalition so that we can isolate the real bad guys, which is the leadership, not the Israeli people, the leadership in Israel and the leadership in the UK. And we can expose this for what it really is.
And if those guys are still under the control of the UK and the government of Israel, and they go, no, we’re not playing, then you don’t have a choice but to take them out. As awful as that sounds. Okay.
You mentioned that you mentioned the UK. And this strikes me. My cousins, my wonderful, lovely cousins, we have a lot of political conversations, don’t agree with them about Trump.
And they’re now right that he wasn’t anti-war and I got it all wrong. Right. But I’ve said to them and I’ve said to other friends of mine.
There’s a really great thread by a British journalist called Jodie McIntyre. Jodie, if you’re please ping me a DM on X and I’d love to have you on my channel. About Keir Starmer’s connections to Israel and to Zionist entities.
Half the cabinet are members of Labour Friends of Israel. Last year, during the 12 day war, the British government was giving intelligence to Israel, supplying arms and went out with the US to bomb Yemen. And in all my adult life, every American misadventure in the Middle East, the British have been there right from the get go.
Let’s bomb Libya. We’ll do it together. Let’s bomb Syria.
We’re together. Iraq, Afghanistan. Let’s do it together.
We’ve got a special relationship where we go around killing other people together like this. Buddies. Buddies dropping bombs.
But not this time. But not here. That doesn’t make sense because it would make good colonial sense for the British to be involved and then get their share, their cut of the Iranian oil wealth.
Unless. If this was a traditional, you know, the way Iraq was or Libya was. But they’re not doing that.
No, nothing traditional about this at all. Now, let me add another thing to your Labour Party comment and Zionism. So this whole journey took me back to the late 1800s in the Fabian Society, which gave birth to the Labour Party.
Yes, I’ve done a video about that with Matt Eric. So if you understand the Fabian Society and their one world government mantra and everything downhill from that Cecil Rhodes. Oh, and the creation of Israel as a strategy of tension in the Middle East to control everything there.
It all Zionism. Who created Zionism? I mean, it was the birth. Yes.
So all of this flows uphill, upstream to Britain, literally upstream to Britain. So they created thanks to Cecil Rhodes diary. They created the Chatham House, the CFR, the Pilgrim Society on both sides of the pond.
So these have been controlling mechanisms all the way down through time. Donald Trump is not part of that infrastructure. British still are.
Yeah. And so they are not going to play well in the sandbox of peace because their entire empire is built on this strategy of tension where they can play all these players against each other. And I believe.
So if you look post World War Two, we talked about in our first show, Pakistan, that was a full creation out of World War Two. Yeah. The British had done that everywhere.
They, you know, split splitting up people, Ireland, Northern Ireland, North Cyprus, South Cyprus, everywhere they go. Yes. So you have Taiwan created after World War Two, Israel created after World War Two.
So if you want war on demand, you set up these countries that and you draw really weird lines. Look at the Kurdish in Turkey, sense of contention in Turkey. The Kurdish in Iran, the Kurdish in Iraq and the Kurdish in Syria.
You can destabilize four countries with one body. Yeah. And that’s the way all of the post World War Two maps were drawn.
And they actually coined the phrase strategy of tension. If I can create a strategy of tension anywhere on a moment’s notice, I’ve got instant warfare any time I want to manipulate the global order. And they create the stay behind units to orchestrate their their terrorism.
That then further illustrates they destabilize those tension lines that they purposely created. Okay. So there may be more ties between Iran, the Iranian, the IRGC, and MI6, and CIA, maybe Mossad than we know about, as evidenced by the UK government’s responses.
Because one thing as a social worker, I’ve never actually seen child abuse happen. Never seen it happen. What I see are pointers and red flags that point to it.
Yes. The fact that Keir Starmer advocates for peace in the Middle East and we need to have a diplomatic solution because he’s such a peacenik, while at the same time sending money for Slav to kill Slav on the steps of Ukraine. Yes.
No, something fishy going on. He don’t care about people. Well, he’s even talked about sending British troops to Ukraine.
Yeah, that’ll work out. Yeah, they’re probably already there. Well, the MI6 and MI5 are definitely there.
Well, MI5 is domestic, I understand. I know. They’re about as domestic as our FBI.
Well, FBI are domestic. No, they’re not. There’s FBI stations all over the world.
Roxanne, I’m not going to talk to you anymore. You shatter my world too much, right? There are FBI. As a matter of fact, we just opened a big one in New Zealand.
An FBI office in New Zealand? Yes. What the hell is that? I don’t know. Okay.
Let me know in the comments below. Why on earth is there an FBI office in New Zealand? I think it must be for the sheep and for the Manuka honey. Actually, if you guys understand, let me just tell you the real reason why they’re there.
A lot of these shell corporations, New Zealand had some very interesting financial rules and regulations that encourage people to set up trusts, blind trusts that no one could ever see who’s the beneficiary of. A lot of the oligarchs that we’ve talked about that’s involved in this entire operation all had entities in New Zealand, and I believe 100% they’re there to track all the money laundering. Wow.
So is the FBI, I suppose there’s a fraction of it that is supportive of what Trump wants to do to clean stuff up? Yes. The leadership currently. Are there still embeds in there that absolutely hate Trump? Yes, there is.
Yes. Those poor Guardian readers. Okay.
Now, when you say about trusts, that’s really, really important because I know about, known a bit about trust and how the elite use them to hide their money and their funds and everything away from scrutiny. Well, in Britain, there’s a very simple free process where you can use trusts. You just download the form, fill in four parts, and you can use this mechanism to legally, lawfully, peacefully withhold your taxes as a protest against war or as a protest against anything that this damn government in Britain are doing.
Open borders, ignoring the plight, not investigating the rape gangs, the assisted dying bill, which thank goodness has died a death. The digital IDs, the destruction of farming, go to notaxforwar.com or upinarms.uk, download the trust form, send it, don’t send any money. It’s all explained and keep your money for yourself.
Roxanne, anything else? No, I think that’s probably it. I don’t want to blow people’s mind too much. Not too much.
Not too much. I still got to walk around on these shifting sands, right? It’s been an absolute delight and eye opener talking to you. Thank you so much.
I look forward to having you on again. Really, really appreciate it. And let us know in the comments, what do you want? What do you want Roxanne to tell you about? If there was a particular bit that blew your mind, give me a timestamp for that.
And thank you very much for watching. This is Rich and Roxanne signing out. All the best.
Bye bye. Bye.
