This is the final episode in a series of films called the “MH-17 Inquiry”, that seeks to determine who benefitted from the MH-17 tragedy.
The “MH-17 Inquiry” describes itself as a project made up of independent Russian and international journalists, experts and scientists who have sought to take the investigation of this case away from politics and conspiracy theories and into a realm of facts and deductive reasoning.
They’ve concluded that the Boeing 777 of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was most likely shot down by a Ukrainian Air Force MiG-29 and that this was probably authorized by the US-installed Kiev regime. They think it is also possible that the shoot-down was a provocation with the purpose of discrediting Russia.
Numerous unfounded accusations of “Russian hacking” made by Hillary Clinton and other members of the US Government belie that the Western political establishment is desperate to go to war with Russia. NSA whistleblower, Bill Binney, the architect of the surveillance technology now being used illegally against US Citizens has come forward to say that the DNC hacks were done by NSA employees, angry with the way that Clinton handled the security of the information with which she’d been entrusted as Secretary of State. Similarly, in August 2014 Binney was among the signatories of an open letter by the group Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in which they urged her to be suspicious of claims coming from US intelligence about the alleged invasion by Russia of Eastern Ukraine.
Yet, the war drums of war continue, with the May of 2016 release of the book, ‘2017: war with Russia’, written by the highest-ranking NATO officer, Sir Richard Shirreff, of the British Army.
When MH-17 Inquiry began their investigation of the tragic flight and of the war in Donbass, they did not imagine that it would reveal an international scandal so vast, politically, economically and morally, that to call it corruption would be an “unacceptable simplification”.
In May 2014, the Washington Post reported that US Vice President Joseph Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, a corporate lawyer, was appointed as a board member of Burisma Holdings, a firm which owns several Ukrainian oil and gas companies and is the country’s largest non-governmental natural gas producer. His appointment was naturally met with criticisms of nepotism and conflicts-of-interest in the Western press.
The MH-17 Inquiry Project suspected that Hunter’s appointment was part of the broader US-led plot to oust Moscow-backed Ukrainian President, Viktor Yanukovych and to steal all of Ukraine’s gas.
In October of 2014, news of Hunter Biden’s expulsion from the US Navy Reserves for cocaine use was made public, although it had occurred 20 months previously – and only one month after he’d been commissioned as a Limited Duty Officer, a post to which he was commissioned after attending a two-week class covering topics such as military history, etiquette, and drill and ceremony, rather than going through boot camp. Because Hunter was too old to be eligible for this program, he needed a waiver. He received a second waiver because of a past drug-related incident (!) But I digress.
Hunter Biden remains one of Burisma’s leaders because of his “business skills”. The Obama Administration was accused of corruption but the White House cut it short with what was almost an admission, saying that, “…the Vice President has pushed aggressively for years, both publicly and with groups like the US-Ukraine Business Forum and privately, in meetings with Ukrainian leaders for Ukraine to make every effort to investigate and prosecute corruption in accordance with the rule of law.”
A Washington Post article about Hunter Biden came to the conclusion that the proxy war in Ukraine, just like that in Syria is all about energy. The MH-17 Inquiry Project similarly had concluded that Donbass was bombed and shelled for three months to cleanse the territory for shale gas drilling and to ensure that the population did not disturb the venture with all of its protests. Alternative news sites, like Zero Hedge also speculated that the plan was to replace the Russian gas pipeline to Europe with a shale gas pipeline from Ukraine, which would earn lots of money for those represented by Burisma and Hunter Biden.
However, the MH-17 Inquiry Project says that this is where “the real detective story begins.” The armed conflict in Donbass all began with a geological survey. Artur Karakozov, a Geology professor at Donetsk National Technical University (DonNTU) is interviewed, saying that the deposits were a likely insignificant, suggesting that the business of shale gas production in Donbass has no prospects. This previously classified information would’ve been known only to very few, such as the people at Burisma.
So, what was was hidden in the Earth of Donbass, which was worthy of starting a war? The MH-17 Inquiry Project says it was the world’s last most carefully-guarded geological secret: a massive deposit of diamonds.
Ukrainian Geologists interviewed say that the moment studies were published about the diamond-bearing Kimberlite in the Donbass region, representatives from De Beers, which owns 80% of the world’s diamond deposits immediately showed up.
The Blitzkrieg in the east of Ukraine did not work out but the predators do not release Ukraine from their embrace. Joe Biden teaches President Poroshenko how to fight the corruption in Ukraine, in what’s probably a Trojan Horse for even larger-scale transnational corruption. Ukraine has gold, in addition to diamonds, rare metals and fertile earth that once made it the former granary of the USSR – but the main thing, of course is to keep setting Ukraine against Russia.
The MH-17 Inquiry Project says they’d like to ask General Shirreff, “Are you secretly dreaming of suicide?…Let’s stop the lift [elevator], which is speeding down towards a new war. We don’t need diamonds, we need peace…there is no person in Russia who would like to spend [their] future in a bunker.