Dr Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters to discuss the findings that explain why some people fall ill from the jabs and some don’t, why some fall ill sooner and others get sick later. But first, she covers a developing story about a federal lawsuit filed by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFD).
AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS LAWSUIT
Attorney Thomas Renz has filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction on behalf of AFD in the Northern District of Alabama against Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to halt the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out for:
1) Children 18-years-old and younger
2) Adults previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and
3) Until such time as the vaccine companies provide ALL vaccine candidates with “truly voluntary, informed consent,” about what is actually in the vaccines, per FDA law.
The lawsuit claims the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the COVID-19 vaccines is unlawful, because:
1) There is No Emergency
2) There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease or Condition
3) The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19
4) The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits
5) There Are Adequate, Approved and Available Alternatives to the Vaccines
6) Healthcare Professionals and Vaccine Candidates are Not Adequately Informed
7) Monitoring and Reporting of Adverse Events is Inadequate.
The case makes use of the testimony of an expert witness, “Jane Doe”, who:
…is a computer programmer with subject matter expertise in the healthcare data analytics field, and access to Medicare and Medicaid data maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Over the last 20 years, she has developed over 100 distinct healthcare fraud detection algorithms for use in the public and private sectors. In her expert opinion, VAERS under-reports deaths caused by the Vaccines by a conservative factor of at least 5.
As of July 9, 2021, VAERS reported 9,048 deaths associated with the Vaccines. Jane Doe queried data from CMS medical claims, and has determined that the number of deaths occurring within 3 days of injection with the Vaccines exceeds those reported by VAERS by a factor of at least 5, indicating that the true number of deaths caused by the Vaccines is at least 45,000. She notes that in the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign (in which 25% of the U.S. population at that time, 55 million Americans, were vaccinated), the Swine Flu vaccine was deemed dangerous and unsafe, and removed from the market, even though the vaccine resulted in only 53 deaths.
The case slams the “The gross and willful under-reporting of Vaccine-caused deaths, which is substantiated by Jane Doe’s Declaration,” whose evidence “makes it irrefutable that the public will suffer irreparable injury if this Motion is denied.”
Furthermore, the lawsuit challenges the legality of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), as the law states that children must be at risk in order to be vaccine candidates, whereas the “CDC states that children are statistically at ZERO percent mortality rate by COVID-19”. It also cites a study commissioned by the US Department of Health and Human Services, which concluded that less than 1% of adverse reactions are ever reported to the VAERS system.
While announcing his filing last weekend to the crowd at Clay Clark’s Awaken America event in Anaheim, Thomas Renz asked “How many have really died and why are they covering it up?” because, obviously, this lawsuit will not be reported in the Mainstream Media and it will likely be censored by Big Tech corporations like YouTube, Facebook, and Google. Renz said that these Big Tech giants are “complicit in causing death”, and said that he cannot wait to sue them “over and over again.”
NIH KNOWS EXACTLY WHO’S GOTTEN WHAT
Meanwhile, Dr Ruby directs our attention to the ClinicalTrials.gov website, which she says is the NIH’s National Library of Medicine, aka US Government’s repository for the data on all clinical trials and she says that Pfizer initially posted the trials of their “vaccine”, which included all of the information on the dosing, the lot numbers, the expiration dates, etc.
She says, “They know where those vials have gone, they know who’s gotten what, they know everything about it. They know who’s been sick, they know the exact numbers of the deaths and of the permanent disability.”
In other words, not only does Pfizer know how many people have been injured and are confirmed dead, but they’re dosing up and they’re ready for 3rd and 4th booster shots.
Stew asks, “How else can you refer to this other than pre-meditated mass murder?”
“I can’t think of anything else, Stew,” she replies. “A lot of it’s starting to make sense.”
Dr Ruby talks about how many of us who have been paying attention have had this working hypothesis that there are different batches and that some people have been receiving placebos. (For whatever it’s worth, I saw a photo posted on Twitter of a batch of vaccines that was labeled “Control”).
She says, “It’s worse than that. They actually have it parceled-out. They know where each dose is going, they know what age group it’s going to. It’s just unbelievably diabolical. And in the words of Dr Peter McCollough, ‘It’s gotta stop!'”
Stew Peters calls this “Pre-meditated murder.” He brings on Dr David Martin and asks him if this is a correct assessment and David doesn’t skip a beat, saying, “Well, there’s no question. When you inject a known toxin – and we’re going to get into this, when talk about the biological weapons laws and treaties of the United States and the world, for that matter – when you inject a known toxin into a person, you are actually injecting an agent of death. That’s what you’re doing and you cannot sit there and hide behind the diaphanous fig leaf of ‘Well, we’re doing it in the public interest’ when you know. Know. Not have a hunch. You know that it is, in fact lethal in many instances. Pfizer has even stated that have an ‘acceptable death rate’. I dunno, Stew. Do you have an ‘acceptable death rate’?”
Stew says, “A lot of people say there are risks with every vaccine.”
“Yeah, but it’s not a risk when you know you’re putting – and get this very carefully, because this is where the RNA story falls apart – people think that a piece of SARS coronavirus was turned into a vaccine. That is not true. A computer-simulated, synthetic, chimeric, computer-generated code, uploaded by the Chinese in January was given to Moderna to put into an injection, so that your cells, in the case of the RNA vaccines…would produce the S1 spike protein synthesis – not the actual virus, the way that we used to do vaccines – this was a computer code uploaded by the Chinese into US manufacturing to inject a pathogen stimulant into the American population.”
Stew says, “This was pre-meditated. There are patents, from what you have discovered going back to 2002, at minimum. This is a planned genocide. There’s no two ways about it.”
DEATH FOR PROFIT
David says, “So let’s take this out of the risk of hyperbole and let’s give it to you in the criminals’ own words. Remember, that the person I’m going to now quote is the veterinarian – not physician – veterinarian who was responsible on February 6th and February 7th of 2020 to control the message that this pathogen came from a bat somewhere in China. That’s the story and we have in Fauci’s emails now. We have, on February 6th and on February 7th, Peter Daszak, on the record, stating that we need a cover story that distances him and the Chinese from this particular pathogen. And that’s in public records. That’s not my opinion but let’s listen to his words in 2015, shall we? Because, this is the criminal indicting himself:
We need to increase for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
“Now, Stew, I’m not going out on a limb. That’s not a public health statement. That is a mercenary…of death.”
“For profit. Death for profit.”
“Oh – and what does he say? ‘Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process,’ –”
“So, let’s identify those investors. Who, exactly is he talking about?”
“He’s talking about the investors in Moderna, in Pfizer and the NIAID and CDC. Remember, that NIAID and CDC, as much as we pretend these are public organizations and public institutions, they are what we call ‘regulatory capture’. They are the front. Think of them as the R&D shop for the Modernas and for the Pfizers and for the AstraZenecas and for the Johnson & Johnsons and the fact of the matter is, these companies, going back to 1990 – remember, the first spike protein, the first one was issued to Pfizer in 1990.
“We’re being told this is some sort of new thing, new response, new pathogen, new whatever else. No, it isn’t. Pfizer patented the first, in this case, canine S1 spike protein coronavirus vaccine in 1990. And we have, without question, the architect of this scam on record, in 2015, stating that, ‘A key driver is the media and economics will follow the hype.’
“That is collusion. That is racketeering. And that is, under the Patriot Act – Section 802 of the Patriot Act – that is domestic terrorism.”
Stew responds, “Violation of US law. The injection of a bioweapon, according to US Code.”
They then quote US Law on bioweapons:
18 US CODE § 175 – PROHIBITIONS WITH RESPECT TO BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
(a) In General.—Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state [CHINA] or any organization to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.