Dr Chris Martenson’s anaylsis of Charlie Kirk’s assassination is now widely seen to be the best out there.

• The actual shot must have come from Kirk’s left.

• The footage of “Tyler Robinson” jumping off the roof is manipulated.

• Tyler Robinson on that roof was not the shooter, the angle was wrong.

• Charlie was shot from the left at a 43º angle, the bullet struck his heart.

• There is an active cover-up going on. Why?

Alexandra Bruce

View all posts

5 comments

Leave a Reply to FTM Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • This one seals the deal: it was (on closer inspection) obviously a MOVIE, complete with obviously (on closer inspection) fake blood (just like in Dealey Plaza and Butler, Pennsylvania) and ANYBODY who says otherwise at this point is (OBVIOUSLY)
    “in on it”:

    https://rumble.com/v6z5jjg-the-charlie-kirk-assassination-hoax-full-breakdown.html

    When they clean up a crime scene post haste (as they did at UVU and Butler PA), it simply means that it wasn’t a crime scene.

  • I wouldn’t say it “solves” the case. It’s just another theory, and to me, not convincing. Possible sure, but still a maybe. Also, it doesn’t help that Chris Martenson is full of himself, and his dismissal of the exploding mike theory (which I still lean towards) is facile.

  • I gathered from this report and other opinions about it that it was the plasma shock wave that instantly stopped his heart. This was demonstrated by the time lapse film recording a high powered rifle round entering into clear gel designed to act like flesh in that circumstance. It explains the sudden inflation of Charlies neck and chest and the big bubble between his back muscle and his clavical where little muscle tissue exists to hold that skin area closer in place.