Styrofoam Snow Catches Fire but Doesn’t Melt

Styrofoam it ain’t.

Snow is obviously melting.
We can see the melted liquid phase of water receding away from blowtorch (an inch or so of liquid water), being “sucked” into dry snow.
The ambient air itself seems also to be dry..
Can this “snow” even be called snow or are we talking about solid ice, which formed as a bottom layer on their driveway, being compacted by vehicles for many months throughout the last winter and thus containing many organic impurities incorporated into it?
Should we call it ice or very compacted snow?
If we are looking in fact at a block of ice than we are dealing here with many more frozen water molecules which are packed more densely into a block (in comparison to fresh snow) thus, since there are more molecules in the same volume, the energy input needed for melting is much higher. And since the blowtorch is limited in its energy output (calories per time unit) the ice melting time is higher then with the same volume of snow and consequently longer melting time allows for more of the recently liquefied water molecules being evaporated into the ambient air before they can coalesce into dripping drops of water.

We can see that the blowtorch locally liquefies the ice/snow into water, then some of it is “sucked” into the dry ice/snow away from the torch and majority of water is evaporated into dry ambient air by the blowtorch heat. That is why there is no dripping. Blowtorch itself is pointed upwards and this upward flow of blown hot air prevents any liquid begin dripping down.

She should have melted a similar block of snow slowly on her stove at home in a covered pan as a control experiment. There the presence of any liquid water would falsify her assumptions.
Then she should evaporate the water and observe if there is any residue material left.
If any residue, apart from organic material packed into block of ice, were to be left in a pan after water had been evaporated, she should visually inspect the residue to determine its origin and then try to burn the residue with a match to get rid of organic substances (not a blowtorch which spits its own unburnt propellant out continuously, thus the name blow & torch).
And the material left after burning could then be assigned to chemtrails.
But by skipping the several necessary steps needed to connect ice/snow with chemtrails she lost all those who like to think logically.
Maybe it would be better for the sake of all those who recognize there is the real problem in connection with chemtrails if she didn’t make this video, since she admits she’s not good at it.

The charring black burning material embedded inside the block of ice is probably organic (plant-based) or we are seeing incompletely burnt carbon (constituent of propellant gas) due to low temperature of blowtorch fire, a result of low oxygen mixture setting (the guy obviously doesn’t want to burn girl’s hands).

Styrofoam it ain’t.
Logician she isn’t.