by Jim Hoft
The truth is starting to work its way to the surface and it does not bode well for Liz Cheney, Nancy Pelosi, and the fake news media.
Recent footage released by InvestigateJ6 reveals police officers started firing on an unsuspecting crowd without warning.
The Trump supporters had no idea they were going to be fired on by heavily armed police.
The Trump supporters also had no idea that federal officers, and undercover police had invaded the pro-Trump crowd that had worked its way to the US Capitol.
This video below by Investigate J6 is devastating. It shows police firing on the Trump crowd without warning. This confirms previous reports by The Gateway Pundit and interviews with J6 attendees who reported on the vicious and unprecedented brutality by the police on January 6.
This also plays into the accusations that this was a setup complete with government agents who infiltrated the Trump crowd.
As Zero Hedge reported:
House Speaker Mike Johnson has released over 40,000 hours of J6 footage including capitol police body cam footage to the public in the interests of transparency, an action which should have been taken years ago. Each new piece of footage only confirms what many Americans already understood – That the few scant minutes of available video recycled by the media paint a false picture of what really happened. Many would argue that J6 was nothing more than a protest that was turned into a riot by police incitement and establishment spin.
Even worse, there are many people now languishing in prison because of that spin.
The latest footage shows capitol police inviting protesters into the building as they peacefully assembled in the corridors (the same people who would later be prosecuted and labeled “insurrectionists”)…
…Keep in mind that if such tactics had been used to incite BLM or pro-Palestinian riots there would undoubtedly be 24/7 news coverage of it.
These revelations further confirm why J6 footage was withheld from the country for so long.
This is why they don’t want the J6 footage to be released!
it was the final act in the regime’s assault on the American public.
You Are a Foreign Sovereign, Not a “Sovereign Citizen”
Anyone who has listened to me over the years knows that “Sovereign Citizen” is an oxymoron. You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen at the same time; the two terms are mutually exclusive.
So where did this nonsense of “Sovereign Citizens” get going?
It got going because of a fence, and a confusion.
Think of a fence — any fence, split-rail, picket, stone — whatever you like.
Your view changes, and so does your language, depending on which side of the fence you are on.
With respect to me, King Charles III is a Foreign Sovereign.
With respect to an Englishman, King Charles III is his Sovereign– the one empowered to conduct international business for him.
To this Englishman, the idea of a Citizen (someone working for some level of government) being a Sovereign is ridiculous.
But in America, State Citizens, people acting as Fiduciary Deputies for each one of the States — act as Principals equal to King Charles III.
Oh, how offensive!
To an Englishman.
This is how State Citizens get mischaracterized as “Sovereign Citizens” by Englishmen who don’t understand how a simple State Citizen could function on a par with their King.
Our State Citizens, of course, aren’t actually functioning as Sovereigns and as Citizens at the same time, rather, they are Fiduciary Deputies functioning in a sovereign capacity on behalf of their State of the Union.
There is a difference between being a Sovereign, like King Charles III, versus engaging in the responsibilities and exercising the rights of a Sovereign, as our State Citizens do when they act as Fiduciary Deputies for their respective States.
Yet, it has to be this way in a country where every man and every woman inherits sovereignty in their own right at birth.
Someone has to take on the servant’s role to conduct business for each State.
So our State Citizens temporarily eschew their own sovereignty as individuals and bow down and serve as Fiduciary Deputies for the rest of us.
For an Englishman, their own natural sovereignty is relinquished at birth and given away to their King.
For an American, our natural sovereignty is retained, and only loaned on a conditional basis to our Fiduciary Deputies.
This is how a State Citizen can act as a Sovereign equal to a King, sign and enforce contracts equal to a King, and direct the international business affairs of their nation-state in a manner equal to a King.
For us, everything is 180 degrees turned around, because we are on the opposite side of the fence.
If you want to get the proper meaning and context of things across to your British Territorial Employees, and your Municipal Employees, too, correct them when and if they make the mistake of calling you a “Sovereign Citizen” and tell them that you are a Foreign Sovereign with respect to them.
Thank you very much.
Nothing here but pop up ad mania!