Basic Logic is a rapidly-growing YouTube channel that is just over a year old and closing in on half a million subscribers. The channel’s creator, who’s in his 20s says he maintains his anonymity because he has “Pissed off a lot of people in a very short amount of time.”
To those outside the Leftist bubble, the extreme contradictions and hypocrisy of the Left make them appear stupid but Basic Logic reminds us that:
“These supposed idiots have managed to capture nearly all of the West’s institutions, the universities, the bureaucracies, the corporations, and even the churches.
“They succeeded in their stated short-term goal of unraveling Western traditions and social norms, while simultaneously growing more powerful and dominant with each passing decade, turning opinions that would be unthinkable a few generations ago into mainstream dogma. This is not the pattern of a true idiot, but rather someone playing the fool for advantage.”
He then asks, “If that’s the case, then what is the modern Left’s true endgame?” a question which he doesn’t answer but which I’ll attempt to do in a moment.
He examines the hypocrisy of feminists who talk about how dangerous life is for women – but then import the exact people who make life dangerous for women and the workers’ rights advocates who say they’re fighting for the bargaining power of the working man – but vote to import the cheap labor that crushes their bargaining power and the Socialists who want billionaires to stop having such a monopoly on political power – yet almost all the billionaires enforce their same Leftists politics within their corporations and within their online platforms.
He says he’s found that in these situations where ideals contradict, the simplest way to determine what’s important to somebody is to find out what they absolutely will not sacrifice.
He notes that feminists have ignored the hundreds of thousands of female victims in the UK grooming gangs, whose perpetrators were Pakistani Muslims. Yet, they viciously defend the single victim in the Cornell 7 case, whose alleged perpetrators were white. He concludes that, “Mainstream feminism is a smokescreen for attacking European descendants.”
The same goes for Socialists, like Bernie Sanders, who have historically defended workers’ bargaining power, lobbied to make rent affordable and defended the welfare system. However, modern Leftists (and Sanders) completely disregard those goals to justify the mass importation of non-Europeans, which collapse and destroy all of the above.
Even LGBT is getting thrown out the window, in favor of importing more Third-Worlders, who are utterly hostile to them. He says it’s gotten to a point where Leftist politicians have disavowed what they call “Woke 1.0” as “crazy”, so as to appeal to the foreign population, in regards to LGBT.
He concludes that mass immigration is the one thing the Left cannot sacrifice, because it has become central to Leftist strategy, as it’s the only policy that guarantees they stay in power.
He presents charts showing how if only white women voted in the US, the Democrats would never win an election again but if only non-whites voted, Democrats would never lose an election.
He says:
“Because of this, Democrats and Leftist parties in Europe need a constant influx of non-Europeans to maintain themselves. And in fact, the more demographic change there is, the better, as less white people means better chances in elections.
“But why do non-Europeans vote for them in the first place? It’s simple, Leftists promise them stuff that they take away from Europeans. It’s effectively Racial Communism.
“The Leftist points at disparities between racial groups, and says the reason is ‘discrimination’, and they’re entitled to another group’s stuff. Instead of class division, it’s race division…
“Therefore, modern politics in 2026 can only be described as a racial divide. If you think white people shouldn’t be erased, you’re Right Wing. If you think they should, you’re Left Wing. And if you don’t care either way, you’re a Centrist.
“Differences in economic stances, social issues, foreign affairs, are all secondary to that one simple axis. And I can prove it to you.”
Basic Logic then runs a short clip of YouTuber Asmongold, who is considered “Right Wing” by today’s standards, talking about how he supports abortion up until birth, he supports Gay Pride, as long as gays aren’t expressing their sexual proclivities around children. He “completely supports Food Stamps”, he says African-Americans helped build America and we owe a “blood debt” to them and to the Asian-Americans “who helped build our railroads”, etc.
These positions are hardly “Right Wing” and Basic Logic disagrees with most of them, yet both YouTubers are considered to be “Right Wing”, because, as he says, “All that matters in the modern political climate is whether you’re for or against your own people…For all the disagreements I may have with Asmongold, he doesn’t want to see his people go extinct, and neither do I.”
So, what is Left’s true endgame? The answer may relate to what’s being discovered about the recent Paris riots. Neville Roy Singham, the same American-born Cuban-Sri Lankan Communist billionaire who financed the LA riots and the Anti-ICE riots in the US over the past year has been found to be one of the financiers of the Paris Riots by Fox News Digital’s Asra Nomani.
Shanghai-based Singham works closely with the Chinese government and state media and he finances numerous NGOs and shell companies that spread pro-Chinese government messages in the US, South Africa, Brazil – and now France.
The US House Committee on Ways and Means began an investigation into Singham and his connections to the CCP last January and subpoenaed three of his tax-exempt NGOs last July.
Far-Left influencer, Hasan Piker is a part of Singham’s network. He was issued an administrative subpoena by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control last May.
Another major organizer of the riots in France is the La France Insoumise party of French presidential candidate, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who has reportedly stated that only an alliance between progressives and Muslims could lead to a Socialist revolution. He recently told a television audience:
“They keep talking about “native French people.” Native to what? Christian roots? What exactly are these roots?..
”All those dreaming of a static world are dreaming of something that no longer exists and will never exist again.”
• IF YOU CAN’T SUBSCRIBE, PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING A DONATION HERE
• SNAIL-MAIL ADDRESS HERE
Thank You!
SEE ALSO
The Mechanics of Domestic Information Warfare & Influencer “Talent Agencies”
VIDEO: “How Your Favorite Internet Celebrities Are Manufactured” - by Black Pigeon Speaks - Pub Aug 29, 2026 by ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net
TRANSCRIPT
Basic Logic: Despite all the activism and virtue signaling, it’s hard to actually pinpoint what leftists stand for. If I ask an LGBT activist what he wants, he’ll tell me he wants more rights and security for his community. But he’ll then vote to import the people who throw their community off buildings.
Same old contradiction if you ask a feminist, who’ll speak endlessly about how dangerous life is for women, but then import the exact people that make life dangerous for women.
If I ask a workers’ rights advocate, he’ll tell me he’s fighting for the bargaining power of the working man, but instead he votes to import cheap labor en masse, crushing their bargaining power.
And if I ask a Socialist what he wants, he’ll tell me that he wants all the billionaires and corporations to pay their fair share, and to stop having such a monopoly on political power. And yet, if I ask him why almost all the billionaires and corporations are seemingly siding with him, and enforce his positions on online platforms, he fails to give me a convincing answer.
In the face of so much blatant contradiction and hypocrisy, most people simply assume Leftists are just stupid. And while the average Leftist absolutely makes a compelling case for that, we have to deal with the fact that these supposed idiots managed to capture nearly all of the West’s institutions.
The universities, the bureaucracies, the corporations, and even the churches. They succeeded in their stated short-term goal of unraveling western traditions and social norms, while simultaneously growing more powerful and dominant with each passing decade, turning opinions that would be unthinkable a few generations ago into mainstream dogma. This is not the pattern of a true idiot, but rather someone playing the fool for advantage.
And if that’s the case, then what is the modern Left’s true endgame?
(Promo)
The first step in discovering the true purpose of modern Leftism is to do away with the red herrings. Many, including myself, have studied Leftist literature and poured over their history to try to determine their goals, whether by reading Marx, or looking to the Frankfurt School, or matching their ideas to influential philosophers or even ancient sects.
But the simplest way to determine what someone truly believes in is to figure out what they absolutely will not sacrifice. And if you remember most of the examples in the introduction, you’ll likely have a good idea.
There’s a clear pattern when it comes to Leftist triage, when their ideals contradict.
Take feminists, for example, they’ll ignore – even laugh at the hundreds of thousands of female victims in the UK grooming gangs. Yet, when a woman obviously falsely accuses her colleagues, even admitting to it, feminists are up in arms in defense of her.
Why? Because in Europe, the perpetrators of the worst epidemic the region has ever seen are the mass immigrants. Whereas in the Cornell 7 case, many of the alleged perpetrators were white. Feminists will viciously defend women, provided that it is an excuse to attack white men, but will refuse to do so and even attack the victims if it isn’t. Therefore, mainstream feminism is a smokescreen for attacking European descendants.
The situation is the same with Socialists. Leftism has historically been associated with economics, with the defense of workers’ bargaining power, making rent affordable, survival of the welfare system, etc. But modern Leftists seem to completely disregard those goals to justify the mass importation of non-Europeans, which causes the exact opposite.
Even protecting LGBT, which has been a mainstay of Leftism these last few decades, gets thrown out the window the moment they have an opportunity to import more Third-Worlders, no matter how hostile they are to them.
It’s gotten to a point where Leftist politicians have disavowed what they call “Woke 1.0” as “crazy”, so as to appeal to the foreign population more, especially in regards to stances on LGBT.
Therefore, it’s clear that mass immigration is the one thing the Left cannot sacrifice, and this has dire implications for our political reality.
(Promo)
Mass immigration is central to Leftist strategy, because it’s the only policy position that guarantees their stay in power.
Westerners are tired of Leftism. While women’s voting patterns are often blamed for the rise of Leftist policies, and rightfully so, if just white women voted in the US, the Democrats would never win an election again in the foreseeable future. But if only non-whites voted, Democrats would never lose an election.
Because of this, Democrats and Leftist parties in Europe need a constant influx of non-Europeans to maintain themselves. And in fact, the more demographic change there is, the better, as less white people means better chances in elections.
But why do non-Europeans vote for them in the first place? It’s simple, Leftists promise them stuff that they take away from Europeans. It’s effectively Racial Communism.
The Leftist points at disparities between racial groups, and says the reason is “discrimination”, and they’re entitled to another group’s stuff. Instead of class division, it’s race division.
Since white people generally won’t vote for Leftists enough anyway, as the number of white useful idiots has been shrinking, plundering them has little negative effect on a party’s performance, but has a massive positive impact by bribing the non-European populations.
The problem is, the combination of redistributing the local population’s wealth to outsiders, and the demographic consequences of mass immigration represents an existential threat to European descendants, by killing their birth rates and self-determination in their own countries, as you’re seeing on screen.
Within decades, Europeans will be the minorities within their own countries, and projections of what could happen within centuries are even more grim.
Therefore, modern politics in 2026 can only be described as a racial divide. If you think white people shouldn’t be erased, you’re Right Wing. If you think they should, you’re Left Wing. And if you don’t care either way, you’re a Centrist.
Differences in economic stances, social issues, foreign affairs, are all secondary to that one simple axis. And I can prove it to you.
Here’s a clip of Asmongold, probably one of the biggest supporters of this channel, sharing his political beliefs, which are often the exact opposite as my own.
(Roll video)
Asmongold: I think abortion should be legal up until birth. I completely support people being gay and even any level of Gay Pride, to the extent that it’s not expressing sexual proclivities around children. African Americans did actually helped build America and we owe a blood debt to these African-Americans and also Asian-Americans, who especially helped build our railroads. I completely support Food Stamps…
Basic Logic: If we were divided by regular political differences, then Asmongold and I would be bitter enemies on opposite sides. Instead, because all that matters in the modern political climate is whether you’re for or against your own people, we’re completely aligned. For all the disagreements I may have with Asmongold, he doesn’t want to see his people go extinct, and neither do I.
The Left, on the other hand, openly brags about the grim demographic future we’re facing. And when we call them out on it, they have the audacity to call us “conspiracy theorists”.
Have you noticed an odd pattern? Whenever someone talks about the demographic future of Europeans, the massive tech corporate oligarchs that are somehow aligned with the alleged Socialists, often put a disclaimer saying that demographic substitution is an “unsubstantiated conspiracy theory”.
As time has progressed, that disclaimer has been using more and more specific language. Initially, it said any demographic substitution was a “conspiracy theory”. But after the demographic reality became undeniable, they switched to “intentional demographic substitution is a conspiracy theory”, as though the severity of extinction differs by intent.
But now that we have politicians and commentators openly advocating for it, as you’re seeing on screen, I wonder how they’ll revise it further.
Perhaps as things progress and become even more undeniable, they’ll keep revising it until they start talking about “demographic substitution” in the past tense.