As a former Green Beret who worked both on Wall Street and as an analyst for US Army Special Operations in counterterrorism and counterproliferation, EM Burlingame’s assessment is that the Trump administration has done enough to disrupt the Globalists’ money flows and logistics that a nuclear World War III is now off the table and that they’re currently deciding whether or not to retreat and regroup or to push forward with the substantive manpower that they’ve already forward-deployed (i.e., illegal migrants).
In the US, ICE’s remigration efforts have removed the threat of the known cartel and terrorist operatives who were placed here as the Globalists’ warfighters to kick off a civil war in America.
The US Military and the US Treasury’s actions in Latin America and the Middle East have shut down narcotics-trafficking and the oil ghost fleets and related money-laundering operations, preventing the shipment of the commodities needed to sustain kinetic warfare in the US, UK and Europe.
EM believes that the Globalist-Financialists, who he calls “The Resentfuls” are currently deciding how to adapt to the next phase in the war and determining if they’ve already hobbled us enough economically and flooded us enough with illegal migrants, that if they were to go kinetic against us, we would crumble.
“There are two paths ahead of them that they have to decide upon. And one of those is, do they go ahead with civil war, with all the stockpiles and everything that they have available now and hope that they can retake some of the global chokeholds, so that they can sustain logistically?..
“It can only supply itself and finance and fund itself and command-and-control itself for so long in a knock-down, drag-out fight. And maybe that’s not without the chokeholds and logistics flows and the illicit capital flows that have been steadily taken off the table over the last year and a half…
“They’ve been using the deportations, etc to go after is the Civil War infrastructure folks on the warfighter side. And then, they’ve been taking-out, with Venezuela, with Colombia, with Qatar, with Iran, and other places…removing the illicit funding channels, and more importantly, the illicit movement of natural resources that would be necessary to sustain a war – an actual physical war; civil wars in Europe, in the UK, United States, etc – as well as going after the banking, financial systems; enabling Japan to break free so it can set its own monetary policy, so that the yen carry trade isn’t being used to fund and finance a war or conflict, etc…
“The Financialists, City of London and others, have to make a determination about whether they’re going to proceed with civil wars with what they have…They have to make that determination, and it’s not a certainty that even here, where we’re all gunned-up in America, most people with the guns will never use them, and even in self-defense. That’s just psychologically, historically true…
“So it’s not a given that were they to go kinetic with what they already have built up, that we on the other side, on the defense side, would prevail…
“They have to make a determination whether they’re going to proceed with the kinetic, or if they’re going to pull back, plant the seeds of a future kinetic action…
“They haven’t made that decision yet, right? They’re working through all that process, and all that vast complex processing, and so we’re all in a liminal state…
“This is how wars are really fought. I wrote the book, ‘The Eternal War’…about this very thing; about how this Resentful’s mind works.
“Operationally, they have lines of doctrine. Saul Alinsky wrote them. They have lines of effort. People like Cloward-Piven and others have written it.
“These things go all the way back to the Fabians, that go back long before the Fabians, by the way. The Fabians are a Jesuit construct, right? Well, their predecessors were. And then, they get shaped by [British politics], etc.
“So, this is old warfare. This is what you do. War is not what people see in the movies or TV. 90% of wars, most people have no comprehension of, whatsoever.”
The Globalist-Financialists “Resentfuls” are on the offensive side. We, the Sovereigntists, who he calls the “Responsibles” are on the defensive side. The Resentfuls are the ones driving how far things get taken. We are responding. The Resentfuls are now probing to see how many among the citizens they can rile up to fight on their side against the Sovereigntist Responsibles.
EM continues:
“We are moving as aggressively as we can on all of those efforts that have already begun. We are taking stock of where the enemy might move, how they might move. But unlike they, who have to make assessments about what they’re going to do, most of what we’re doing is continuing operations and refitting and waiting to see what they do, because it’s going to be something we wouldn’t – maybe we thought about – but the enemy comes at you in ways that you haven’t thought about. And they think about that a great deal.
“And they probe, and they test, and they feint, and they see how we respond, and they see where we’re weak, where we’re not paying attention.
“That’s why they did COVID, because we weren’t paying attention to the medical system. We weren’t paying attention to the healthcare system. So, it was a prime vector of attack to get inside the walls of the castle and the old ways.
“So we don’t know exactly how the enemy is going to move, and we also, more importantly, don’t know that the enemy is going to move. Maybe they’ve decided, ‘Hey, we’re going to keep our wealth, we’re going to keep what we got, we’re going to hold the positions we got, we’re going to go underground for a while, and we’re going to rebuild and reset ourselves for another generation or so.’..
“We don’t have a substantive plan, defensive positions in, already. And they know that. Why? Because they’re infiltrated everywhere throughout us, right up including in the palaces of Buckingham…
“I suspect we’re gonna see feints and probes against different systems to see where – it’s what you do in a war. So, social systems, legal systems.
“We’ve seen this, here in the United States with nobody judges stepping out and trying to do nationwide fatwas basically, when they have no Constitutional or legal grounds to do so. That’s all feints and probes.
“So before you go kinetic, you test, you do loyalty tests to see how much kinetic power, force, how many people are gonna do, you know, step in as underground, you know, auxiliaries underground; join guerrilla forces, etc.
“So you poke and probe a whole number of different communities in different ways to see how faithful your people are, and how many of the general community might join your faithful in a fight against the Responsibles – against us, right?..
“So you test and you test and poke and prod and you create these illusions, so you can bring in power and you can do all this. And then yes, you suck Patriots in who are too dumb to realize that they’re being sucked into an intel operation, which is what The Troubles was.
“The Troubles was specifically an intel operation on both sides, so that Sinn Féin could get in power, which would effectively reverse Ireland’s independence…
“That’s what we do. We send in a terrorist organization, create all the problems and we have to do that on both sides, so that it looks legitimate. But we can have it under control, because you don’t want a legitimate insurgency.
“Then, what we do is we spin a political group out of the insurgency, out of the insurgents – sometimes out of the very same people who founded the insurgency, you know – ostensibly – founded the insurgency in the first place.
“And they’re…the ones who are seeking a political solution. They’re disillusioned with the violence and all that other sh¡t…Nevermind that they’re literally the same founders or founding members of the actual terrorist organizations, etc. They work directly with them. They can communicate with them because, ‘We were once them, we don’t agree with it. So we can talk to them in ways you can’t.’
“It’s all a setup. The whole thing done, from the terrorism in the first place and all of that was to get that political group into power, because through that political group, now you control…Sinn Féin is directly an MI6 construct. Directly.”
EM says he’s seen the exact same tactics in Pakistan, India, the Philippines, Malaysia and it is how the English were, themselves conquered by the Black Nobility (Rome) without armies and foreign invasions in the late 1600s.
He says it’s what they’ve been trying to do here, in the United States using 9/11 and counterterrorism and economic warfare:
“They do have to make a decision: Have they flooded us with enough people who are not us – and that’s not an ethnic thing. It’s a civilizational thing – but have they flooded us with enough people that are not us and have no desire to be us and couldn’t be us, even if they wanted to, that they can make their move, now?
“They can make a violent move. They can make an all-out capture of the institutions move, like we’re seeing in Canada, like we’re absolutely seeing in Ireland, like they’re doing here, in numerous states, although we’re pushing back better, although we haven’t come to the extent that you guys are.
“So that’s where we are, in this liminal state; is the Resentfuls have to make a decision about whether they have enough flooded into our countries, they have enough stockpiled, they have enough capture of systems that they can move against us openly, no matter what the old families, the old power, the people might do, even if the people rise in violence. They have to make that decision…
“If you know a fight is inevitable and you’re in it, you don’t allow the enemy to choose the timing and the place, because that’s optimal for them. So everything’s been accelerating since 2016. And now, it’s accelerating ever faster as, you know, these choke points that we talked about earlier and other dependencies, other alliances that they’ve been relying on for so long are being broken, systematically broken and realigned.”
As for recent US actions in Latin America and Iran and the exposure of Europe as the biggest beneficiaries of these criminal regimes he says:
“[It’s] just bringing out into the open and making visible what was invisible and nefarious before. So it’s not like we’re forcing the world into some new harness. No, no, no. We’re cutting the strings on portions of the harness and letting things become visible.”
TRANSCRIPT
INTRO
EM Burlingame: Do they go ahead with civil war with all the stockpiles and everything that they have available now, without the chokeholds and logistics flows and the illicit capital flows that have been steadily taken off the table over the last year and a half?
Crypto Rich: Trump has been stopping the money flows, freeing up the chokeholds, destroying the structures that keep the City of London replenished and in control. OK, what does that mean?
EM Burlingame: Barring a miracle, World War III is off the table.
Crypto Rich: Off the table?
Crypto Rich: Hey EM, thank you so much for making yourself available.
EM Burlingame: Of course.
Crypto Rich: I really do appreciate it. I have links in the description below where people can find your work.
Now, before we started recording, you said that we are in a “liminal state” and just the little that you said, what I understand by it is a sort of like a stasis in between something.
EM Burlingame: Yes.
Crypto Rich: So say more about this. What are we in between and what’s happening?
EM Burlingame: So, maybe a little bit on liminal states. Liminal states comes from chemistry and well, physics and chemistry. And it means that you’re in that indeterminate or mostly indeterminate place between one stage, one phase, one composition and what’s going to emerge from that or what’s going to come next.
And you’re not quite what you were, exactly, although you have remnants and you’re not yet chemical-change, state-change, energy-change, whatever. So that you’re not yet that which is going to come next. You’re in that in-between, indeterminate, mostly indeterminate space, right? It’s called a “liminal space”. And it’s a very important concept for people.
But globally right now, we’re in a liminal state and think in terms of war, because that’s what we’re all watching play out over the last decade or so, right? Is this last, the crisis phase of this saeculum, but this whole saeculum is a crisis phase of the 400-year English Civil War.
So, we’re in like the last liminal state of this indeterminate, major indeterminate state of the final crisis phase of the final saeculum in this four. So, OK what does that mean? World War III is barring a miracle, World War III is off the table.
Crypto Rich: Off the table?
EM Burlingame: Off the table. And what that means is that nuclear war – again, barring some really extraordinary thing – is off the table.
OK, well, if World War III is off the table and movements have been made in that process to make it very difficult for civil wars to emerge; to be logistically and financially provided for by the very same infrastructure that was going to fund and back and logistically support World War III, then how does the Administrative State, how do the Financialists adapt to the next phase in the war?
And there’s two paths ahead of them that they have to decide upon. And one of those is, do they go ahead with civil war, with all the stockpiles and everything that they have available now and hope that they can retake some of the global chokeholds, so that they can sustain logistically; they can rebuild manufacturing rapidly, can restart the engine of global civil war turned into world war – pockets of civil wars turned into a world war turned into what they want, with what they have stockpiled, what they have available, where the manpower they have already forward-deployed, etc, which is rather substantive.
But it can only supply itself and finance and fund itself and command and control itself for so long in a knock-down, drag-out fight. And maybe that’s not without the chokeholds and logistics flows and the illicit capital flows that have been steadily taken off the table over the last year and a half.
Crypto Rich: OK, if I can just stop you there, just to make it explicit for people to know what you’re talking about. Are the chokeholds what the City of London, the British Empire hold, the Globalists, and then what’s been taken off? How Trump has been stopping the money flows, freeing-up the chokeholds, destroying the structures that keep the City of London replenished and in control?
EM Burlingame: Yes, and not just the City of London, this is Rome, and this is the old…the occupiers of the English-speaking peoples, which is the British, etc, as we’ve discussed before.
Primarily two things have been taken off the table. And here, in the United States, with the first year or so of ICE operations – remigration, deportation efforts – most of those folks that were targeted were known cartel people, known terrorist people, etc.
That’s what they’ve been using the deportations, etc to go after is the Civil War infrastructure folks on the warfighter side. And then, they’ve been taking out, with Venezuela, with Colombia, with Qatar, with Iran, and other places…removing the illicit funding channels, and more importantly, the illicit movement of natural resources that would be necessary to sustain a war – you know, an actual physical war; civil wars in Europe, in the UK, United States, etc – as well as going after the banking, financial systems; enabling Japan to break free so it can set its own monetary policy, so that the yen carry trade isn’t being used to fund and finance a war or conflict, etc.
Even if that’s a somewhat kinetic, but mostly 5th Generation war; lawfare and all that, because civil war isn’t just physical guns in the streets, etc. It’s a whole lot of – 90% of the war is fought in markets, in lawfare and reputation warfare, information warfare, etc, etc. So most of that infrastructure has been taken off the table.
So again, the Financialists, City of London and others, have to make a determination about whether they’re going to proceed with civil wars with what they have. Because they believe that there isn’t enough support, particularly here, in the United States, there, in the United Kingdom, across the Anglosphere, specifically; there isn’t enough support for legitimate government for the people, for our way of life, that we’ve been flooded with too many people, etc; that if they went kinetic for a short period of time, we would capitulate.
They have to make that determination, and it’s not a certainty that even here, where we’re all gunned-up in America, most people with the guns will never use them, and even in self-defense. That’s just psychologically, historically true.
Now, you’ll get a good percent more here than you would elsewhere, but that’s because elsewhere in the Anglosphere, they’re not armed. You’d get about the same percentages there, if they were armed, right?
So it’s not a given that were they to go kinetic with what they already have built up, that we on the other side, on the defense side, would prevail.
And so they have to analyze, as we would do in any battle, as like the Battle of the Bulge, where the Germans are on the back foot, and they made an analysis they were going to go all in. And quite frankly, if Patton hadn’t made it in time, they might have succeeded.
They have to make a determination whether they’re going to proceed with the kinetic, or if they’re going to pull back, plant the seeds of a future kinetic action or continued fight and they’re going to pull back, let all this burn out, and not take this far enough to where they get rooted-out, where they get torn out, root and stem.
They haven’t made that decision yet, right? They’re working through all that process, and all that vast complex processing, and so we’re all in a liminal state.
Crypto Rich: OK. Now, how do you know this? How can you tell? What are you seeing?
EM Burlingame: Because it’s war. It’s how wars are fought. This is unconventional warfare. This is literally what I went to the schoolhouse for, and spent years – well now, a decade and a half – studying, right?
This is how wars are really fought. This is, I wrote the book, ‘The Eternal War’, I don’t remember, five years ago, six years ago, four years ago, about this very thing; about how this Resentful’s mind works.
Operationally, they have lines of doctrine. Saul Alinsky wrote them. They have lines of effort. People like Cloward-Piven and others have written it.
These things go all the way back to the Fabians, that go back long before the Fabians, by the way. The Fabians are a Jesuit construct, right? Well, their predecessors were. And then, they get shaped by [British politics], etc.
So, this is old warfare. This is what you do. War is not what people see in the movies or TV. 90% of wars, most people have no comprehension of, whatsoever.
Crypto Rich: OK. So then, would it be accurate if I expressed it this way, that where we’re at is where both sides are taking stock of which direction to go, what strategy to employ, how can they prevail over their opponents?
EM Burlingame: Yes and no. So, on the offensive side, which is the Globalists, Resentfuls, etc, they’re on the offensive side. We’re on the defensive side, although there is offensive defense and defensive offense at times, etc.
But for all intents and purposes, they are the adversary and they are the ones driving how far we take things. What the enemy is doing, what the Financialists, the Globalists, etc are doing, [the] resentful-minded folks, is they are having to take stock of their actual capabilities, now and process and compute things that they haven’t had to in a very long time. Very, very long time.
On our side, we are the Responsibles, [the] Sovereigntist side, we are moving as aggressively as we can on all of those efforts that have already begun. We are taking stock of where the enemy might move, how they might move. But unlike they, who have to make assessments about what they’re going to do, most of what we’re doing is continuing operations and refitting and waiting to see what they do, because it’s going to be something we wouldn’t – maybe we thought about – but the enemy comes at you in ways that you haven’t thought about. And they think about that a great deal, and they probe, and they test, and they feint, and they see how we respond, and they see where we’re weak, where we’re not paying attention.
That’s why they did COVID, because we weren’t paying attention to the medical system. We weren’t paying attention to the healthcare system. So, it was a prime vector of attack to get inside the walls of the castle and the old ways.
So we don’t know exactly how the enemy is going to move, and we also, more importantly, don’t know that the enemy is going to move. Maybe they’ve decided, “Hey, we’re going to keep our wealth, we’re going to keep what we got, we’re going to hold the positions we got, we’re going to go underground for a while, and we’re going to rebuild and reset ourselves for another generation or so.”
Or does the enemy still believe that they have a chance if they do this, this and this? And some of the things, a couple of things they do – they won’t do one thing, it’ll be a whole portfolio of things – and two or three of them will be things that we expect and the rest will be things that we didn’t expect; maybe we thought about, but we didn’t expect and we don’t have a plan.
We don’t have a substantive plan, defensive positions in, already. And they know that. Why? Because they’re infiltrated everywhere throughout us, right up including in the palaces of Buckingham, both with people giving intel and information to the enemy, the Parliamentarian.
I use this loosely, right, “the parliamentarians”, but the oligarchs and the security of the Royal Family. It’s the same in the White House, it’s the same elsewhere. We have these inside threats, these inside problems, and they’re feeding information constantly. So they know more about who we are and what we’re doing than we do about them…
Let’s say they throw 10 things at us globally. Three of them we might have built-in defensive positions already, the other several we won’t, and they’ll know what that is.
(Promo)
Crypto Rich: OK, and how come we don’t have – or the Responsibles don’t have infiltrators in with the Resentfuls?
EM Burlingame: We have some here and there, but most of those have already been used in to be able to keep us where we are on the, you know, in, you know, in order for us to have succeeded at all the, you know, fronts of the war that have been going so far, we’ve had to use most of those assets, you know, most of those human assets.
Because, once you use the information, once you act in certain ways upon certain information, the individuals who gave that to you show up as obvious inside those, you know, the enemies, institutions, organizations, networks, circles, etc.
They’re like one-time ciphers. You can use them one time, maybe twice, but after that you’re gonna have to pull them out, because the enemy, the Resentfuls, don’t trust them.
And that’s the other thing: Resentfuls don’t trust each other by nature, because they screw each other all the time. Right? There is no honor amongst thieves.
Crypto Rich: They’re all crooks. They’re all vying for power.
EM Burlingame: Correct. They’re all violent mobsters, yeah.
Crypto Rich: Any indications that their structures are breaking apart through infighting?
EM Burlingame: No. You want a prime example? You just got an even gayer guy put in as a Prime Minister, there.
I know, because Larry’s been talking. Larry the Cat’s been talking to my cats, and he’s pissed.
Crypto Rich: (Laughs) You’re giving away your secret, that the source of your intelligence is the cats. Because cats, they remain diffident, and they watch, and they notice everything.
EM Burlingame: That’s right. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They don’t get upset about what their servants are doing.
Crypto Rich: Yeah. And they don’t give stuff away like dogs. Dogs you can tell. No.
EM Burlingame: Yeah, no. Cat will never narc you out. I mean, you gotta slip in a little catnip every once in a while, right?
Crypto Rich: That’s right. That’s right. OK. What’s gonna come next? How is this gonna play out?
EM Burlingame: I suspect we’re gonna see feints and probes against different systems to see where – it’s what you do in a war.
So, social systems, legal systems. We’ve seen this, here in the United States with nobody judges stepping out and trying to do nationwide fatwas basically, when they have no Constitutional or legal grounds to do so. That’s all feints and probes.
So before you go kinetic, you test, you do loyalty tests to see how much kinetic power, force, how many people are gonna do, you know, step in as underground, you know, auxiliaries underground; join guerrilla forces, etc.
So you poke and probe a whole number of different communities in different ways to see how faithful your people are, and how many of the general community might join your faithful in a fight against the Responsibles – against us, right?
And so, that’s what we’re seeing in the legal actions here. We’re seeing what the political movements there like this frickin shit that happened in Scotland here recently by putting an English woman, although she looks like a troon to be quite frank, but putting an English woman in as an MP for Scotland.
Crypto Rich: I didn’t know that.
EM Burlingame: Oh, yeah, some blonde-haired – and then she was crossing her fingers. And she even said before she gave the oath that, “I don’t agree to any of this,” and then gave the oath.
It’s all what it is, is it’s obvious in-your-face: “This is all a joke. You all keep going along with it. We’re showing you that it’s a joke. And we’re the power.”
That’s a probe. That’s a test to see, “Will there be genuine violent riots against the government in the United Kingdom?”
Or will it only be the performative theater ones in Ireland right now, which have every indication of being government intelligence operations? Every indication everybody I talked to is like, Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, that’s, that’s, that’s SAS. That’s frickin’ Intel agency. That’s MI6. That’s frickin it’s and you know, in the equivalent in Ireland and in Brussels.
So what and then, on the other side, you test and probe to see if your own violent faithful or ready to go.
Crypto Rich: OK, what would be the motivation? Let me try. I’m going to ask the question then try and answer it myself. OK. What would be the motivation for the SAS MI6 to stir up violence in Ireland, other than as a way of preempting what the Irish patriots may do, and bringing in authoritarianism before the Irish patriots get going.
EM Burlingame: So, Ireland is going to assume the EU’s Presidency here soon. And there is a read about the military forces that are being appointed their naval forces, look at the drones that are being brought in for the security of because of the weakness of Ireland’s national defense. Look at all of the things that are being appointed to Ireland around the argument of the safety and security of senior EU members who will be traveling in and out of Ireland regularly, as Ireland hosts the Presidency.
So you want to create the illusion, the concept and idea that the Irish are rising and you need to suppress the Irish and you use Ireland as a testbed because it’s so small and it’s contained. And if something happens there, you can lock it down quick.
So you test and you test and poke and broad and you create these illusions, so you can bring in power and you can do all this. And then yes, you suck Patriots in who are too dumb to realize that they’re being sucked into an intel operation, which is what The Troubles was.
The Troubles was specifically an intel operation on both sides, so that Sinn Féin could get in power, which would effectively reverse Ireland’s independence.
Crypto Rich: OK. Now I think I read this on your X about this right now for people who don’t know, “The Troubles” refers to the late ‘60, early ‘70s.
EM Burlingame: Into the ‘80s –
Crypto Rich: The struggle between the IRA against British rule in Northern Ireland.
EM Burlingame: Ostensibly.
Crypto Rich: The Sinn Féin were a Republican party, the political wing of the IRA.
EM Burlingame: So that’s how it’s done. So first, we send a terrorist organization in.
Crypto Rich: EM, in that moment, I thought to myself, God, I’m so dumb! I’ve been listening to you for ages and there’s still stuff I haven’t worked out!
EM Burlingame: No, it’s not – there’s a difference between lack of direct experience and intelligence, right? So, not dumb.
That’s what we do. We send in a terrorist organization, create all the problems and we have to do that on both sides, so that it looks legitimate. But we can have it under control, because you don’t want a legitimate insurgency.
Then, what we do is we spin a political group out of the insurgency, out of the insurgents – sometimes out of the very same people who founded the insurgency, you know – ostensibly – founded the insurgency in the first place.
And they’re…the ones who are seeking a political solution. They’re disillusioned with the violence and all that other sh¡t.
Nevermind – and ostensibly they’re separate from – nevermind, they’re literally the same founders or founding members of the actual terrorist organizations, etc. They work directly with them. They can communicate with them because, “We were once them, we don’t agree with it. So we can talk to them in ways you can’t.”
It’s all a setup. The whole thing done, from the terrorism in the first place and all of that was to get that political group into power, because through that political group, now you control.
This is how they took England in the first place by…corrupting Parliament, causing problems in the country, getting seven Lords to be traitors and then Parliament to go against its oath. And they brought in a foreign army then, right? To calm all this down because England didn’t want to go back to another civil war.
So to calm it all down, they bring in a foreign King with an army backed by Amsterdam, right? By the banks, the Venetian bankers in Amsterdam. And they take control of the Crown of England, the Executive, ostensibly so that England didn’t devolve into another civil war.
Well, it’s the same thing we do, we’ve been doing forever since then, only we use terrorist organizations.
And then, we spin out of that a political group, the political group has a political solution, what they get into power. And now what has happened? We’ve overthrown that country, that government, whatever the Hell it is, without the need for armies.
Crypto Rich: OK, and sucked out all the life and energy of any Republican movement within the –
EM Burlingame: And anything that might be a genuine resistance, we use the efforts and operations that we’re doing to suck them in, and then we assassinate them, kill them, take them out, ourselves.
And we corrupt whatever they were saying, articulating their networks, etc.
This is the thing that’s been going on. We’ve been doing this for centuries upon centuries upon centuries. It was done to us.
Crypto Rich: We have a Sinn Féin, which is as Woke as the Loyalist parties. They’re –
EM Burlingame: Yes, Sinn Féin is directly an MI6 construct. Directly.
Crypto Rich: OK. You know this for a fact, or again, this is speculation?
EM Burlingame: I am piecing together conversations that I’ve had with certain people and historical facts; certain people that were directly involved in certain aspects of things over time, and piecing together history and talking to other folks that have pieced it together the same.
Crypto Rich: And pattern recognition.
EM Burlingame: Pattern recognition. I ran across this in Pakistan. I ran across this very same pattern, you know, between Pakistan and India.
I ran across this very same pattern, exactly same pattern in the Philippines with an MNLF and become the... Well, spin out the MNLF. The MNLF is the political party. When I was doing counterterrorism, I was like, “Wow, this is exactly like the troubles in Ireland!”
And then, you look at, well, who’s funding them, backing it? And who are the participants in the center? It’s like, “Oh, no, this is exactly the troubles in Ireland, only it’s playing out in the Philippines.”
We watched it in Malaysia in the 1950s and 60s. Not ‘we’, I wasn’t even born. But, you know, this same pattern, right, is how the English were conquered, you know, conquered without armies and foreign invasions in the late 1600s.
That’s how you retake a country. It’s what they’ve been trying to do here, in the United States and almost effectively done, only here they used, you know, 9/11 and counterterrorism and all this other kind of stuff.
Never mind that all those people, if you trace it back, Bin Laden, everybody else, they all go back to CIA or MI6, directly. So it’s not, you know, speculation, supposition, etc.
It’s like, no, it’s just it’s right out there. And, you know, Roxanne, Colonel Towner, she gets into all the gnats ass details of it. Right?
Again, I’d hate to be in an argument with that woman because she brings so many facts and data. Right?
Crypto Rich: Do you know, I recorded a video with her recently, and we were talking about the CIA and just the terrible, terrible things the CIA has done against the American government. And I said to her rather naïvely, I said, “Why is the CIA doing this against its own government?” And she laughed and she said, “The CIA has never worked for the US Government.
EM Burlingame: It’s actually in their charter. So there’s two charters for the CIA. There’s one for the CIA, itself as an intelligence organization. And then, there’s the charter for the [Special] Operations Group.
And the Operations Group was specifically set up to operate independent of the US Government oversight, the President, everybody else, ostensibly in order to carry out what the President needs but to do that with plausible deniability.
They’ve never worked for [the US Government].
Now, I do want to qualify one part: The analysts, at least first- and second generation, maybe third generation analysts, did believe they were working, most of them did believe they were working for the United States.
I’ve had pleasure to meet several of them and they are solid, solid people. That is fundamentally different, though, than the Operations Group, which was set up fundamentally different.
And by third, fourth generation, we’re now in the fifth generation of the CIA and modern MI6, because there were precursors, you know, predecessors to MI6. But, you know, third, fourth, fifth generations are just off the rails, even in the analyst side of things.
And unfortunately, you do still have a good number of people as an analyst, which is what I did – not with the intel agencies, but in counterterrorism, counterproliferation work in Special Operations – you do also have a good number of analysts who are very genuine people.
The problem is that their on-the-ground intelligence, that then helps feed their analysis is flawed, because the on-the-ground intelligence is collected by who? The Operations Groups. And so, they corrupt and pollute the analysis that comes out right from the very beginning, from the initial inputs.
Crypto Rich: The way I listen to what you’re saying, it’s a little bit like people become teachers because, out of genuine, authentic interest in the welfare of children and their education, but they’re inside this completely flawed system.
EM Burlingame: Correct. That feeds them, you know, feeds them information about the psychology of children and the problems children are dealing with, all this kind of stuff that aren’t true, at all.
And so the teacher – and then unfortunately you do – once you have a malevolent system, excuse me, once you have a malevolent system, then you do attract malevolents, who have no desire to do whatever the actual work is. They just want to use this malevolent system to harm people, to bring about their agenda or, you know, to feel some sense of power.
Crypto Rich: Yeah. Yeah. Or just “make progress” or whatever. Having grown up in a part of London, which had a very large Irish Catholic community and where I and my friends had sympathies for the Republican Movement. Now, to discover that was a CIA, well, an MI6 front –
EM Burlingame: Well, I’m backed by the CIA because a lot of the money and the guns for the IRA came out of the US or through the US. I might or might not have been sitting in the back of an Irish pub in the early 1980s. Well, mid 1980s when, you know, conversations were bad around me and just being the curious fellow I am, I could piece together what wasn’t being said. Like, “Oh, what? You were just where?”
Crypto Rich: OK. Talking to you over these many, many months and piecing together what you’ve been saying about how the First World War was used to destroy aristocracy, how, and then looking at seeing what’s happening currently under this, under Keir Starmer and then soon to be likely Andy Burnham government. And then, how the, you know, we got rid of grand juries in the early part of the 20th century and just all the many, many ways that our rights and liberties have been whittled away, you know, with the creation of the European Union as this so-called democratic entity, which is not, at all. It’s a politburo, right?
EM Burlingame: Yeah. It’s a virus.
Crypto Rich: It’s a depressing picture. It doesn’t seem to be getting any better.
EM Burlingame: Well, that’s like the book I wrote, though, ‘The Eternal War’. This is an eternal fight. The fact that we’re all still here, we can have these conversations and we’re not eradicated or totally enslaved, although we’re mostly, pretty close, totally enslaved. But the fact that we can have these conversations, we can see these things means that our ancestors have succeeded, at different times when things got this bad, because they have, repeatedly. And that has to give us courage and hope.
And the one unique thing, again, about the English civilization specifically, again, started with Alfred formally, but really with his grandfather Ecgberht, is that we, the English of English-speaking peoples, the Anglosphere, the Anglo-Saxons, you know, whatever you want to say, we’ve been able to do it without having, you know, without going through a Russian Revolution and the slaughter of Communism. We’ve been able to do it by getting to a point where “Saxons begin to hate”.
That’s an old saying, right? “Saxon hate”. And we have a short, sudden knock-down, drag-out fight, but we don’t clean the slate and start all over. We restore what was, and we refine some of the gaps in our legal code and our constitutionality.
You know, we learned over the last 400-years cycle, how the enemy has used the forgiveness and understanding of our civilization against us. And we figured out how to encode in law, plug some of those gaps.
But the Resentfuls never stopped seeking to corrupt all of our systems and everything. That’s what they are. That’s who they are, right? And so, over a period of time, they’re going to corrupt it again.
And we are slow to respond to that, because we do have an extraordinary amount of error correction mechanisms built into our civilization and all of its structures and codes and beliefs, etc.
That’s why they’re flooding us with so many people that are not us, that do not have those codes, do not have that error-correction, have no desire to sustain it or protect it, at all.
Because we’ve been through these things before, numerous times and we’ve been able to adapt and overcome. And we must take great hope in that, because I believe very firmly, and again, I could just be a fool, right? But I believe very firmly that we still have that civilizational error-correction, massive error-correction within us, as a people.
And oh, it turns out that yes, the vast majority of the newer arrivals over the last 20 years, maybe 30 years, maybe even 40 years are not us and are people that were intentionally brought in by the CIA, MI6, etc, because they were their operatives in the countries they came from.
But a lot of the non-heritage peoples who have come into our lands before that are very much like us. And they do resonate with our civilization. They do resonate – they keep their cultures, but they resonate with our civilization. They resonate with our codes and morals and values and all of that.
So I believe this is why everything’s being accelerated. And this is why we’re in a liminal state is that the Resentfuls, the Financialists, Globalists, whatever the Hell we want to call them – down underneath, they’re all Resentfuls – that’s down below all those other labels.
They do have to make a decision. Have they flooded us with enough people who are not us – and that’s not an ethnic thing. It’s a civilizational thing – but have they flooded us with enough people that are not us and have no desire to be us and couldn’t be us even if they wanted to, that they can make their move, now?
They can make a violent move. They can make an all-out capture of the institutions move, like we’re seeing there, like we’re seeing in Canada, like we’re absolutely seeing in Ireland, like they’re doing here, in numerous states, although we’re pushing back better, although we haven’t come to the extent that you guys are.
So that’s where we are, in this liminal state is the Resentfuls have to make a decision about whether they have enough flooded into our countries, they have enough stockpiled, they have enough capture of systems that they can move against us openly no matter what the old families, the old power, the people might do, even if the people rise in violence. They have to make that decision.
Crypto Rich: And then, I suppose we do have what the MAGA movement and Trump, in particular and his team are causing in the United States, allied with Putin and with Xi, as well to defeat the Globalists.
EM Burlingame: They’re accelerating. Yeah, they’re accelerating everything, because you do not allow the enemy to choose the time and place of the fight.
If you know a fight is inevitable and you’re in it, you don’t allow the enemy to choose the timing and the place, because that’s optimal for them. So everything’s been accelerating since 2016. And now, it’s accelerating ever faster as, you know, these choke points that we talked about earlier and other dependencies, other alliances that they’ve been relying on for so long are being broken, systematically broken and realigned.
And most of that realignment is not nefarious, at all. It’s actually just bringing out into the open and making visible what was invisible and nefarious before. So it’s not like we’re forcing the world into some new, you know, harness.
No, no, no. We’re cutting the strings on portions of the harness and letting things become visible.
Crypto Rich: OK. EM, thank you so much. Always an education talking to you.
Please join my paid community. I will be doing monthly calls for paid subscribers. Links in the description below.
And I’ll also have EM’s links. Please do follow him.