by Chase Hughes
Are you being manipulated without even realizing it? In this video, we unveil the Manipulation Playbook—a detailed guide to recognizing the 20 indicators of reality control used by media, corporations, and even governments to shape what you think, feel, and do.
From fear tactics and emotional scripts to the overuse of authority and timing tricks, we break down how these strategies work and how you can spot them in real-time. Using the F.A.T.E. Model, we’ll show you actionable steps to resist manipulation, think critically, and stay in control of your perspective.
This isn’t just about uncovering the lies—it’s about empowering yourself with tools to stay grounded in a world full of noise and hidden agendas.
🔗 Bonus: Download our exclusive PSYOP Detection Tool in the description to rate manipulation tactics on a 1-100 scale. http://nci.university/reality
To be fair to Mr. Hughes…there’s this short, sweet youtube video…
Only 0:39 min.
“If You See THIS, You’re in a PSYOP!”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b-LEtmWKo_s&pp=ygUSQ2hhc2UgaHVnaGVzIHBzeW9w
Featuring Joey”Ayahuasca” Rogaine!
TLDR:
“If the topic is silenced and even basic questions or discussion are squashed….it’s a psyop.”
Alexandra: compare & contrast…
Danny Jones interviews Hughes:
Chase Hughes uses “the Milgram Experiment” to illustrate a point he wants to make about ” intelligence training”…go to the 6:06 mark.
https://rumble.com/v67adg4-military-psyops-operative-inside-the-mind-of-a-master-manipulator-chase-hug.html
Then check out my next post …
“Since Milgram’s results were first published in 1963, they have been seen as strong evidence of humanity’s willingness to obey authority figures to hurt others. In the common recounting, nearly two-thirds of subjects progressively administered shocks they believed to be painful and potentially dangerous to others at the urging of the experimenter.
The fact is that Milgram had conducted 20 experiments with different procedural variations or conditions — and with different results. With some procedures, more than six of ten people disobeyed the experimenter’s orders. Milgram downplayed or hid this more complicated reality; he did not publish a report about the variations until a decade after the initial report. One variation was never published. Instead, Milgram chose one particular experiment to tell the story, where 65 percent of the subjects inflicted shocks up to the maximum.
Using this result, Milgram linked it to the Nazi Holocaust. He claimed that his results illustrate human willingness to follow orders to harm others, a broad conclusion considering the particular experiment involved just 40 men. This has since become received wisdom about human nature, while his research has become part of popular culture.
We now understand, however, that scientists can produce results to support particular agendas. Milgram ignored his experiments that resulted in majorities disobeying orders. Those results did not fit the agenda. In short, the truth is not as black and white as Milgram had led everyone to believe.
…In addition to Milgram’s questionable selection and omission when he publicized his results, there were also ethical issues with how the experiments were conducted. Milgram claimed that once the experiment ended, subjects were told the truth about the setup to relieve their anxiety. The fact is that three of four subjects did not receive the truth at the time. Some had to wait months or a year, while some were never told what they had not actually tortured or hurt anyone.
Even at the time, there was criticism of Milgram’s deceptive and manipulative methods that caused severe stress upon subjects. Harvard denied Milgram tenure in part due to the controversy. His experiments helped provoke a discussion in his field about the ethics of research. In 1973, the APA adopted stricter ethical standards, such as requiring informed consent from subjects, that would preclude the replication of Milgram’s experiments.”
_________________________
“First, do no harm”.
Perfect, er well almost. Let us not forget venues and devices.
Principle change agencies in the 20th century were Hollywood, Madison Avenue, the great NYC broadcast networks and they never relaxed for a second. This continued into the 21st century enhanced and turbocharged with the proliferation of electronic visual devices.
The importance of acknowledging this is it helps one to isolate sources of change agency’s tactics and make informed choices, because we are all vulnerable to suggestions. To make my point, I can remember cigarette and chewing gum radio ads as far back as the late 1930’s and in some cases sing their jingles even now word for word. These advertisements made America famous for smoking cigarettes and chewing gum world wide by the 1950’s because we are like monkeys doing the organ grinders bidding for peanuts.
Never underestimate the power of advertising or entertainment! Especially when it’s mingled with sex, because SEX SELLS! I wont go further, but I could, because ad men know exactly what they are doing.
Be discerning and discriminating about venues and devices too.
TLDF (i.e., Didn’t Finish watching the whole thing).
I’ve come to use a very simple test to determine when a PSYOP is being thrown: “What are the odds?”
What are the odds that the JFK “event” just happened to occur right in front of some normal guy who just happens to have a professional quality color video camera? Per Google’s search results, “In 1963, color video cameras were not common in the consumer market, and were primarily used in professional broadcasting and television studios. While color television was becoming more popular, the technology for affordable and portable color video cameras was not yet widely available.” {f you watch the Zapruder film again, you will see Jackie holding “JFK”s head up so that “Zapruder” – and, I guess, the guy on the grassy knoll – can get a good shot of the explosive charges planted in the Animatron’s head exploding (making it look like the Animatron had been shot in the head.)
What are the odds that George Mohrenschildt just happened to be buddies with both the Oswalds’ and Jackie’s family?
What are the odds…of JFKs deeply CIA-and Timothy Leary-connected girlfriend (Mary Meyer) getting “randomly murdered” (albeit, somehow bloodlessly, despite being shot in both head and heart) less than one year after JFK’s fake death?
What are the odds? Ok, the list of 9/11’s “miraculous coincidences” is covered in detail elsewhere, but “all 4 airline pilots neglecting to enter the ‘being hijacked’ transponder code” is just one example. (NB: no planes were destroyed in the making of the “9/11: You goys will believe ANYTHING!” movie.)
What are the odds…that Israel decided to leave their Iron Curtain outdoor prison wall unguarded on the exact day they’ve told their agent-provocateur Hamas leaders to have their Hamas useful idiots attack?
What are the odds…that all the MSM (including that Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer) decided to cover DJT for the first time at the Butler PA rally if they didn’t hear something big was going down?
Do you see it yet?
What are the odds…that there was a whole “we’re all in this together”, C-19 propaganda campaign sitting on the shelf, ready to be slapped up on every wall of every HUD Housing apartment building, if it was actually a “novel virus”? (Actually, it WAS a novel virus: only the novel was fiction.)
I’ve come to the conclusion that the motto is: “when it absolutely has to be done perfectly, by all means FAKE IT!” Looking back (with 20-20 hindsight), I must conclude that every event of note for hundreds of years has been faked in one was or another (lookup Miles Mathis to find out how Lincoln’s assassination was faked – Booth was a Yankee intel asset – and I will bet money that Robert E Lee was one as well).
Thank you for your time.
Just serms like piling on.
Suspicion.
Fear.
Excessive analysis.
Spooky music and production values
Supply and Demand say we have enuff of that already.
s/b “Just *seems* like piling on”.
Feels like a ” just take this supplement! IT SOLVES EVERYTHING!!!” pitch that everybody and their three-legged dog have been selling since the bioweapon roll-out.
5min in, no mea culpa from the guy,
been running psyops in the dark/background…hadda change of heart???
Not that I can see.
So why is this not just another paranoid, time-waster layer of this weeks psyop?
Get in the Q/Que.
2 weeks.