Peter Schweizer, a respected investigative journalist and author, recently revealed that Joe Biden has a secret “global cell phone” gifted to him by none other than the “smartest man he knows” son, Hunter. Given the current scrutiny of Joe and Hunter’s sketchy business activities, this revelation has many people raising their eyebrows.

Real Clear Politics:

PETER SCHWEIZER: It’s interesting, what is the line of communications between Hunter Biden and his business partners and Joe Biden when he’s vice president of the United States? It’s not the government phone, it’s not Joe Biden’s personal phone. We know from the laptop that Hunter Biden’s business paid for a private phone line that Joe Biden used while he was vice president. It was from AT&T, it was $300 a month, it was a global phone where you could access somebody anywhere around the world.

We shared that phone number and that account information with people in the House Oversight Committee. My hope is that they if they haven’t already, they will subpoena those records because I think it will give an indication on how tight the communication was.

And that may be the phone, for example, that the Ukrainian, the Burisma executive might have used in this allegation that the he talked to Joe Biden in recorded conversations.

I would just say one other thing, Maria, as it relates to that sort of shakedown phone call with Henry Zhao that we alluded to, Henry Zhao in 2015 had already sent $5 million to the Bidens. He was the head of a Harvest Investment firm. And what’s interesting is in the correspondence there, Hunter Biden again talks to Zhao in the context of “this is a deal that’s important to my family” involving his father.

It gets even weirder. Now, the story surrounding this mysterious “secret phone” has taken an unexpected, potentially game-changing twist. Investigative reporter John Solomon claims he dialed the number linked to Joe’s  alleged “secret phone,” and who answered? The Big Guy himself, though John says he quickly hung up.

Liberals are pressing John to produce “video evidence” of the disputed phone call. Whether he’s holding it back for legal reasons, or if such a video even exists, remains uncertain. Only time will tell. But consider this: John is a respected investigative journalist with awards under his belt. Would he really stake his reputation on a lie? It’s not as if he’s part of the “mainstream media” where fake news is part and parcel of the job.