Hillary Clinton “The Nuclear Option Is Not Off the Table”
Alexandra Bruce
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aaGqGvZV_c
As the Democratic Party melts down in rancorous fulmination on the heels of Julian Assange’s release of 20,000 embarrassing emails, the long-suffering Bernie Sanders begs the conventioneers to vote for Neocon warmonger, Hillary Clinton. But is it “progressive” for voters to elect a candidate whose election entails the distinct likelihood of nuclear war?
She, herself has stated more than once that, “The nuclear option is not off the table.” These pronouncements should be seen within the context of the psychopathic glee that she expressed about “her” war with Libya, where she reveled joyously at Muammar Gaddafi’s graphic murder, by which he was sodomized to death with a knife, as recorded by cellphone cameras and witnessed by billions, worldwide.
Anyone who says “Never Trump” needs to understand that Clinton has completely sold out to Wall Street and to the Military Industrial Complex, in her relentless offensive to become the first Woman President of the US and that she will happily do her masters’ bidding, having a strong appetite for bloodshed, herself.
Make no mistake: a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for World War III. She appears well-prepared to commit mass-genocide in upcoming conflagrations planned by the US’ Wehrmacht against Russia and Iran.
Most Americans want something better than what the Republican-Democratic duopoly crams down our throats. We’re mad as Hell and, as seen in the Conventions of Cleveland and Philadelphia, we’re starting to realize how powerful we are: We don’t need to take it anymore – do we?
