TRANSCRIPT
My name is Philip Buckhaults. I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I’m a cancer gene jock.
Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. And what that means is that I’m kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed-with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don’t.
The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA.
It’s not just mRNA. It’s got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in-vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true, because I sequenced it in my own lab.
The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy. And for reasons that I still don’t understand, he kept every single vial.
So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them.
We had two batches that were given out here in Columbia. And I checked these two batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can see what’s in there.
And it’s surprising that there’s any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology.
But you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there.
So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest.
There’s a lot of cases, now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It’s hard to prove what caused it. It’s just, you know, temporarily associated and this DNA is a plausible mechanism.
It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells.
And it could cause – theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern – but it’s pretty reasonable, based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where, in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene.
I think it’ll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.
Has any of this knowledge changed government public health policy? The same can be asked of the medical mafia.
The only thing I see that has changed is they’ve become less aggrressive, but they are still on the same course as in 20-22. My family doctor is still on the same course, my specialists are still on the same course, carrying the water for the government/pharmaseutical complex. The same personalities are stil there plying their trades, business as usual.
Friends, when we recognize ducks, but accept being told they are chikens we are living in lies. Tolerance of evil doing is cupablity and depending upon the degree of tolerance maybe even cowardice.