This is a short intro to the story of the elongated skulls from Paracas, Peru and the DNA tests, ordered by author-researcher, LA Marzulli on 4 of the “Paracas skulls”. The results were announced in late July, 2016 but for a host of reasons, this Earth-shattering information has received very little attention. Despite my keen interest in this development, even I only ran across this story just now.

Mainstream paleontologists won’t touch this line of inquiry with a 10-foot pole, so these very expensive tests were conducted with financial help from Marzulli, who produced a DVD, which contains a more detailed report of the findings.

Similar skulls have been found in every continent across the globe but in the 1920s, a Peruvian archeologist discovered over 300 of these in a cave near the town of Paracas, on the southern coast of Peru.

The skulls are naturally-elongated and do not derive their shape from the practice of “cradle-boarding” or other techniques used in ancient cultures around the world to purposefully cause a cranial deformation that resembles the Paracas skulls.

There are many differences between these Paracas skulls and those of normal Homo sapiens. Their brain capacity is significantly larger, their eye sockets are much, much larger, their cheekbones are much more robust, as are their teeth. Their skulls, which have a much higher bone density than those of humans have only 2 parietal plates, instead of the 3 plates in the skulls of Homo sapiens.

Of the Paracas skulls which still have hair, the tresses are uniformly fine and auburn, in contrast to the thick, glossy black hair of indigenous Peruvians. The hair of a two-year-old baby Paracas skull is strawberry blond.  The Paracas skulls whose skeletons remain attached to their skeletons show that these mysterious people, who thrived for a couple of millennia in this coastal region of Peru had a stature of roughly 6 feet, which is much taller than that of the native Peruvians of today and certainly that of their European contemporaries.

This brings us to the dumbfounding findings of the DNA tests: The bizarre DNA relationships that these skulls have to ancient and modern European populations (!)

The only identifiable genetics in these skulls pertain to Western Europe, Northern Europe and the Middle East (!) None of the haplogroups of the indigenous populations of the Americas were detected in these DNA samples.

The above-mentioned 2-year-old baby Paracas skull (the age determined by a forensic dentist) and estimated to have died 1,950 years ago had DNA from haplogroup U2e1, which is found in proto-Germanic and proto-Balto-Slavic peoples.

As Brien Foerster remarks, on his website, “This means that those ancestors did not walk across the Bering Land Bridge!” He surmises that they arrived to the Pacific coast of Peru by boat, via the Indian Ocean.

That’s not all. The second skull tested, obtained by a US physician in the 1930s and discovered at a site in Oroya, Peru is that of an individual who perished 850 years ago, according to radio carbon dating. The only haplogroup detected was T2b, which occurs from the Middle East to Iceland, with heaviest concentrations in Georgia, Eastern Italy, Sardinia, Netherlands, Southern Portugal and Iceland (!) The broader T2 haplogroup is most heavily concentrated in the Eastern Baltic areas and in the traditionally Celtic areas of Brittany, Wales, Western Scotland and Eastern Ireland.

Neither the U2e1 or T2b haplogroups are found among the indigenous populations of the Americas.

Obviously, Old World Caucasoids, whose DNA match that of the Paracas skulls’ are not coneheads with huge eyes and teeth!

These DNA findings have opened up many more questions than they have answered!


Contributed by


You Might Like

Alexandra Bruce

View all posts


  • The author states these skulls are “naturally-elongated,” unlike forced cranial shaping used by other cultures. Yet, in one photo of a Paracas skull, a band or vise – if you will – can be clearly seen wrapped around the skull, above which the bone has been forced to bulge. Interesting to note the indentation is the exact width of the band. How is this, then, be deemed “natrual”?

  • There are many non-fictionalized clips like this on YT, that are extremely effective enlightenments. Possibly another here:

    But there are also hoaxes where there is money to be made. Quite often, authentic discoveries are kept from the public eye out of fear, or due to religious superstition which has many diverse manifestations.

    I try to keep an open mind, while questioning everything. Religion and superstition close the mind. Purveyors of fiction know how to use both.

    This looks authentic, thanks Alexandria.

  • I’ve been following Brien’s work for years. Now if we could get some scientists to follow, do some work, and publish some papers in some journals, maybe, just maybe, some realization of this might shake some people up, and maybe, again, get recognized, as, say a pre human, with more abilities then we have today. But, that would rock the boat, and maybe get it to sink. Yeah! I am sick and tired of being fed lies, from “schools” and “government”. I’ll start by saying we are not the top of the list, we are easier to control, we are the latest experiment from the lab, and not much more. Most people can’t, or won’t see past the end of their nose, let alone the fact, we are a test group, and if we survive, each other, we might get to meet our creators, but, you must be able to think outside the box we have been trained to live in. WAKE UP PEOPLE! Open your eyes, and your mind.

      • I’m assuming you are being literal with your question, HOW?

        It begins with the need to know the truth about your own world and the multiverse, followed by unceasing years of research into every discipline out there, finding the odd dots that weirdly fit together while never “believing” any one thing you find. If you start to “believe-in” a thing you stop searching, learning and improving your knowledge base. Then, pass it on.

    • I’ve seen a two articles by professional archaeologists who both said Brien Foerster was wrong on many counts: some of the corrections are the paracas skull capacity is in normal human range. the sagittal suture does fuse and disappear in some people with age, and the foramen magnus where the spinal column enters the skull is in he correct position near the jaw. Since the back of the skull is squished up it only makes this hole look further back. Also, the source of the so called in utero fetus with an elongated skull was from an 1851 book whose illustration of the mummy showed it wearing a kilt, and it was not in the fetal position. The location of this mummy is unknown.


Most Viewed Posts