Ron Johnson very rightly says that the problem we have when processing what happened with the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 is one of scale. The buildings and planes were so big that people just buy into the official story because they can’t wrap their minds around the scale of what actually happened.
He suggests that we reduce every factor involved by 10. Instead of a 110-story building, imagine an 11-story building. Instead of a jumbo jet, imagine something like a bus with wings. Running crash test films of planes and trucks, he then asks, “Would a bus flying through an 11-story building like the World Trade Center at 500 miles an hour cause it to collapse and turn into dust? That’s what we’re going to find out…We don’t see any part of the airplane breaking, bending, buckling, twisting or slowing down.” The official story is unphysical.
In addition, he notes, that the official 9/11 videos make much more sense with the airplanes removed. “We see a tower exploding. The wall doesn’t break inwards, it explodes outwards. Animating a shattering exploding airplane [on live TV would have been] nearly impossible, while disappearing an airplane is easy…They needed us to believe the planes went completely inside the towers so that we could believe there was massive damage to the central core.”
The airframes of commercial jets are startlingly lightweight. There is no way in Hell that normal airliners could have traversed the steel columns of the WTC towers. Period.