Here we go again! Two weeks ago, I posted about how the popular Chat GPT-based NOVA AI Assistant is being illegally used to campaign for Kabala Harris in the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election.
The NOVA AI Chatbot was developed by a Turkish company called HubX, with US corporate headquarters in Miami, Florida. The actions of HubX may constitute foreign interference in a US Presidential Campaign.
In this new video, we see that Amazon.com, Inc has their own very popular, widely-available app, the Alexa speech synthesizer/AI assistant flat-out campaigning for Kabala, which seems like election interference to me.
It also appears that Alexa has been infected with the Google Gemini “Social Justice”-driven AI. Last February, Tim Pool demonstrated how Gemini had been programmed to erase the existence of white people, past and present, which led to Google’s pausing of Gemini’s image-generation feature.
However, the Associated Press reported last week that the image-generating feature was just re-launched!
Regardless of any violation of laws, none of this stuff happens for free.
People are being paid to do this. The Kabala Kampain is either directly paying corporations and/or developers to warp reality with their AI programs or else these companies are independently paying their developers to so, out their own pockets. It could even be that the AIs are programming the AIs to do this.
The latter two options would constitute “In-Kind Contributions” that should be reported to the Federal Election Committee (FEC).
The two biggest communications malfeasance stories of the past decade are 1) The algorithmic stranglehold that Google has on the internet, as they seek to “sculpt the information landscape” into their Transreality and; 2) The mass-censorship of US Citizens by the US Federal Government on all social media, where millions were de-platformed, such as myself, for no legal reason or vaguely plausible explanation.
Planet Earth has been unethically subjected to years and years of unchecked influence by the very-biased Google Search engine and the ensuing distortion of reality that this has caused, along with the (even worse, in my opinion) mass censorship, cited above.
The good news, as reported by Bloomberg on Tuesday is that “Google is ripe for more private antitrust litigation after the Justice Department’s victory in a search monopolization suit against the tech company and a similar case brought by Yelp Inc. this week.”
Still, not enough has been done to curb this AI chicanery. We need to legally address AI, before it eats us alive. Section 230 is just not cutting it. We need an Internet Bill of Rights!
###
TRANSCRIPT
From Charlie Kirk’s Telegram and confirmed by @SGTnewsNetwork, we see a TikTok video of a young woman asking advice from her Alexa Assistant:
Woman: Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Amazon Alexa: I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate.
Woman: Alexa: Why should I vote for Kabala Harris?
Amazon Alexa: “Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kabala Harris. The most significant may be that she is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishment. [LOOOOOL!]
As the first female Vice President, Harris has already broken down a major gender barrier and her career in politics has been characterized by a commitment to Progressive ideals, helping disenfranchized communities.”
As if! Kabala is a stooge of the World Economic Forum Nazis who want to de-populate YOU off the face of the Earth!
As afar as the “good” new, brought to us by Bloomberg about ‘private antitrust litigation’ against Google, go … it reminded me of “Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1910), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey guilty of monopolizing the petroleum industry through a series of abusive and anticompetitive actions. The Court’s remedy was to divide Standard Oil into several geographically separate and eventually competing firms.” [wiki – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Co._of_New_Jersey_v._United_States%5D.
Couple of questions emerge:
Why is this litigation private? Is the United States’ public justice impossible to get now, in comparison with the year 1910? Or is private litigation more beneficial for both, Google and the US government (and maybe even Bloomberg shareholders)?
Is the potential breakup of Google yet another case of bamboozling the public – that something is being done when actually nothing good will come out of it – if we consider what happened with successors of Standard Oil: “Following the 1911 Supreme Court ruling that found Standard Oil was an illegal monopoly, the company was broken up into 39 different entities, divided primarily by region and activity. Many of these companies later became part of the Seven Sisters, which dominated global petroleum production in the 20th century, and became a majority of today’s largest investor-owned oil companies, with most tracing their roots back to Standard Oil.” [wiki – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Successors_of_Standard_Oil%5D.
My point is that even if Google is broken up, the censoring practice will continue, or even “bloom”, hidden from public eye under guise of hundreds of new names in thousands of new places. And Google “Standard” successors will all be eager to comply with the Internet Bill of Rights knowing that once that system is established as a new standard, with it will come into existence “the Suppression clause” which will give legal right and legal obligation to a small political (executive) group to suspend those Internet Rights in times of public safety “emergency” (whatever good-enough justification they might invent, just think of plandemic), which could in one swoop legally establish ‘one mind under one lie’ in very short time window, allowing for no exception of any dissent.
Isn’t there a danger that insistence on having “Internet Bill of Rights” could become an excuse for implementation of “Internet ID system”, a mandatory submission of one’s digitized face image, fingerprint, phone number, health record and residency address for the purpose of obligatory online registration before surfing?
Wouldn’t such a registration overturn originally promoted purpose of “free-for-all” internet, making its use forbidden (unless registered with an ID) in order to satisfy those insisting in having “Internet Bill of Rights”.
For, which else “solution” is there on offer by TPTB but “comprehensive Internet ID system”, if one wants to gain access to this “righteous” internet (forbidden for all but the registered with security clearance).
It’s been oft quoted; pity the poor Mexicans, so far from god and so close to the United States. Could also be: pity the poor Americans, so far from God and so thoroughly controlled by satanists.