Join Our Members List For Exclusive Reports




Please leave this field empty.

“A historic act of devastating incompetence” is how Julian Assange describes the CIA’s handling of the extremely High Security data which began to be published by his organization on March 7, 2017, in the largest-ever publication of Confidential documents on the Agency and they’ve only just started.

In case you missed it, here it is, from the horse’s mouth: WikiLeaks’ Press Conference on Vault 7, Year Zero and the CIA, held on March 9, 2017.

Assange begins by describing how reckless it was for the CIA “To have created this arsenal and to have stored it in one place and not secured it. WikiLeaks discovered it as a result of it being passed around among various members of the Intelligence Community. In short: “The Central Intelligence Agency lost control of its entire cyber-weapons arsenal.”

For ten minutes, he goes into a detailed overview of this discovery and its implications. Among the implications is that the very nature of cyber-weapons makes them insecure because they must be deployed on the Internet to be used, which makes them inherently hackable.

Assange assures viewers that his goal with this publication is to make the Internet more secure. Then he addresses questions which he’s received from the Mainstream Media for an additional 50 minutes.

Alexandra Bruce

Contributed by

Contact

monsantiossssss
Alexandra Bruce

Alexandra Bruce

View all posts

17 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • I had been wondering about the timing of when this data reached Julian Assange and subsequent release. Like others have asked, what are they trying to hide? Additionally, could this release, which will certainly throw a lot of people off, or at least cause worry or even fear, be a first step of problem-reaction-solution (PRS). No sooner was I thinking along those lines and James Corbett’s new world next week came out where he talked about the PRS far better than I ever could. Who knows? But something is afoot! Of that I am sure.

    • It is lo-tech because he’s in a very constricted environment. He has been using the cheap-and-easy green screen technique, allowing himself to broadcast with WikiLeaks branding, instead of having the insides of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London as his backdrop.

      The latter would tend to drag Ecuador into his major leaking activities. The .gif (or whatever type of file) seen in the background is keyed in, using 1970s green screen technology. You, too can buy it from Amazon.com for cheap!

      His use of the WikiLeaks logo allows him to dissociate from Ecuador and also to promote his brand.

    • And you know this how? Could you come up with some proof of your statement at least? If not this type of statement is simply to divert the attention and totally meaningless

      • I have used this technique in video production. It is very common and more so than ever, although it has existed since the ’70s or maybe even the ’60s. Here are some competing brands for green screen equipment: https://wiki.ezvid.com/best-green-screens?id=adw&gclid=CM7u1Kz50dICFYmPswodnO4Cuw

        The old term for it is “Chroma Key Effect”. Decades before digital video, you could make an analog electronic command (on the switcher, through which video signals from multiple cameras or sources were fed) to cause a color signal in video stream #1 to channel a feed from source #2. This can be done live or added in post-production. This footage appears to be doing it live, which is part of why it’s sloppy. Source #2, in this case is a video signal of the WikiLeaks logo. You have to light the subject in the foreground properly in order to “pull a good matte” as it called otherwise, the effect is sloppy and you may notice some bleeding of the green around his hair, maybe because it’s so shiny and white.

        Shiny jewelry can cause this problem of bleedthrough from signal #2, so interviewees being videoed in front of a green screen are asked to remove shiny jewelry.

        If Julian’s suit matched that shade of green, the WikiLeaks logo would appear to be coming out of his clothes.

        Basically, that shade of green is uncommon in people’s skin tones and clothes and that’s why that color is used. Originally, they used a shade of blue and the technique was called “blue screen” but blue is more commonly worn by people so they chose a less common color. Red tones would not be ideal for this technique, as reds are on the lower frequency end of the color spectrum and they tend to get fuzzy on video.

        This is a famous example of a green screen FAIL:

        http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/proof-sandy-hook-was-a-staged-media-hoax-anderson-cooper-knowsnose/

  • It would have looked far more professional if his word to lip were matched, looks like the voice over has been placed over his video Alex

    • As a video professional since the late 1980s, the conversion to non-linear digital has made audio sync very weird and kind of impossible.

      Assange had originally scheduled this press conference for the morning of March 7 but he did it 2 days later. I’m guessing that the delay might be related to the security measures they’re taking to ensure their encryption and successful transmission. Can you imagine the power of those who would not wish for this broadcast to occur?

    • Geeezzz this is a revelation of tremendous magnitude to ALL of us basically and you are concerned about the synchronization?

  • if they are letting this out, what are they really hiding? Are they trying to come clean(LOL), no, they are up to something much worse. No longer going to settle for one area at a time, beware, the Ides of March is almost here.

  • So far, I’ve not seen anything in the Vault 7 release that anyone, who is awake, didn’t already know. This release looks a lot like busy work to me–keep ‘um busy work. The Vault 7 release is mostly undecipherable junk pages. I also don’t have a warm and fuzzy feeling about JA’s WikiLeaks site these days either. He disappears for a month, reappears as suddenly as he left, is on the front page of MSN and all over the MSM being interviewed but he gives no explanation for his disappearance, not even to his followers? Something is just not right about that.

    Of course the MSM is going after this thing with their usual ridiculous fervor shouting to the sleepers to FEAR! HATE! and LOATH betrayers! OMG. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! you stupid talking heads.

    • True, it’s nothing we didn’t already know. I was running stories about TVs that can spy on you 6 years ago. It’s basically a confirmation of things many of us knew. Many are calling this a purposeful limited hangout.

    • Yeah this video smells like barnyard sewerage, a high/low tech CGI hoax, looks very badly done and not convincing at all, he has been kidnapped and Wikileakes severely compromised and taken over by the CIA

      • And so the CIA would then proceed to leak stuff like this about themselves? Including infiltrating other gvts so that they can start an investigation about CIA? Sounds a bit corny to me

        • This may or may not be what’s called a “Limited Hangout”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

          According to the above article, a Limited Hangout is “Spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”

detoxestrogen

Most Viewed Posts

Categories